* annotation implies nothing about the quality or performance of the API in question, only the fact
 * that it is not "API-frozen."
 *
 * <p>It is generally safe for <i>applications</i> to depend on beta APIs, at the cost of some extra
 * work during upgrades. However it is generally inadvisable for <i>libraries</i> (which get

 *   <li>Access to the session context used during processing</li>
 *   <li>Correlation of results with their initiating parameters</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * @param <REQ> the type of Request that produced this result, ensuring type-safe
 *              access to the original request parameters
 *
 * @see Request
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Experimental
@Immutable
public interface Result<REQ extends Request<?>> {

    /**

 * [ResponseBody] for an explanation and examples.
 */
class Response internal constructor(
  /**
   * The request that initiated this HTTP response. This is not necessarily the same request issued
   * by the application:
   *
   * * It may be transformed by the user's interceptors. For example, an application interceptor
   *   may add headers like `User-Agent`.

   * safe to do so. The exact circumstances under which a copy will or will not be performed are
   * undocumented and subject to change.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if two keys have the same value or two values have the same
   *     key
   * @throws NullPointerException if any key or value in {@code map} is null
   */

        // Default constructor
    }

    /**
     * Adds an ingester to the factory.
     * The ingester is inserted into the collection and the array is re-sorted by priority.
     * This method is thread-safe.
     *
     * @param ingester the ingester to add
     */
    public synchronized void add(final Ingester ingester) {
        if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {

   *
   * TODO(cpovirk): Could this be simplified if we modified implementations of LegacyConverter to
   * override methods (probably called "unsafeDoForward" and "unsafeDoBackward") with the same
   * signatures as the methods below, rather than overriding the same doForward and doBackward
   * methods as implementations of normal converters do?
   *
   * But no matter what we do, it's worth remembering that the resulting code is going to be unsound

 * invoke methods, they invoke methods on the {@code ForwardingMultiset}.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods and any collection views they return are not guaranteed to be
 * thread-safe, even when all of the methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @since 2.0
 */
@GwtCompatible

 *
 * <p>The {@link org.apache.maven.api.Session} interface is the main entry point for Maven operations.
 * It maintains the state of a Maven execution and provides access to all core services and components.
 * Sessions are thread-safe and can be obtained in session-scoped components using the
 * {@link org.apache.maven.api.di.SessionScoped} annotation.</p>
 *
 * <p>Key capabilities provided through the Session include:</p>
 * <ul>

   *         .addAll(WEBSAFE_COLORS)
   *         .add(new Color(0, 191, 255))
   *         .build();
   * }
   *
   * <p>Elements appear in the resulting list in the same order they were added to the builder.
   *
   * <p>Builder instances can be reused; it is safe to call {@link #build} multiple times to build
   * multiple lists in series. Each new list contains all the elements of the ones created before
   * it.
   *
   * @since 2.0

    tentativeArgs.set(i, alternateArg);
    return createInstance(factory, tentativeArgs).hashCode()
        == createInstance(factory, args).hashCode();
  }

  // distinctValues is a type-safe class-values mapping, but we don't have a type-safe data
  // structure to hold the mappings.
  @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})
  private FreshValueGenerator newFreshValueGenerator() {
    FreshValueGenerator generator =