## Request body + path parameters { #request-body-path-parameters }

You can declare path parameters and request body at the same time.

**FastAPI** will recognize that the function parameters that match path parameters should be **taken from the path**, and that function parameters that are declared to be Pydantic models should be **taken from the request body**.

{* ../../docs_src/body/tutorial003_py310.py hl[15:16] *}

						<phase>prepare-package</phase>
						<goals>
							<goal>report</goal>
						</goals>
					</execution>
				</executions>
			</plugin>
			<plugin>
				<groupId>org.apache.rat</groupId>
				<artifactId>apache-rat-plugin</artifactId>
				<version>0.16.1</version>
				<executions>
					<execution>
						<phase>verify</phase>
						<goals>
							<goal>check</goal>
						</goals>
					</execution>

      assertTrue(burst <= 1000);
      long afterBurst = measureTotalTimeMillis(limiter, oneSecWorthOfWork, new Random());
      // but work beyond that must take at least one second
      assertTrue(afterBurst >= 1000);
    }
  }

  /**
   * This neat test shows that no matter what weights we use in our requests, if we push X amount of
   * permits in a cool state, where X = rate * timeToCoolDown, and we have specified a

      assertTrue(burst <= 1000);
      long afterBurst = measureTotalTimeMillis(limiter, oneSecWorthOfWork, new Random());
      // but work beyond that must take at least one second
      assertTrue(afterBurst >= 1000);
    }
  }

  /**
   * This neat test shows that no matter what weights we use in our requests, if we push X amount of
   * permits in a cool state, where X = rate * timeToCoolDown, and we have specified a

 * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
 * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 *
 * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
 * Lesser General Public License for more details.
 *

We could do better.

We can declare a `UserBase` model that serves as a base for our other models. And then we can make subclasses of that model that inherit its attributes (type declarations, validation, etc).

All the data conversion, validation, documentation, etc. will still work as normally.

   * absent, it will fall back to a heavyweight operation that will open a stream, read (or {@link
   * InputStream#skip(long) skip}, if possible) to the end of the stream and return the total number
   * of bytes that were read.
   *
   * <p>Note that for some sources that implement {@link #sizeIfKnown} to provide a more efficient
   * implementation, it is <i>possible</i> that this method will return a different number of bytes

  //   spinning, so we use SPIN_THRESHOLD_NANOS which is what AbstractQueuedSynchronizer uses for
  //   similar purposes.
  // * We want to behave reasonably for timeouts of 0
  // * We are more responsive to completion than timeouts. This is because parkNanos depends on
  //   system scheduling and as such we could either miss our deadline, or unpark() could be delayed

```

## Subnet Health

 * want their output to be non-null in operations like `stream.map(myConverter)`, and we can
 * guarantee that as long as we also require the input type to be non-null[*] (which is a
 * requirement that existing callers already fulfill).
 *
 * Disclaimer: Part of the reason that callers are so well adapted to `Function<A, B>` may be that
 * that is how the signature looked even prior to this comment! So naturally any change can break