// the extra memory consumption and indirection are more
      // expensive than the extra volatile reads.
      long nanos = expirationNanos;
      long now = System.nanoTime();
      if (nanos == 0 || now - nanos >= 0) {
        synchronized (lock) {
          if (nanos == expirationNanos) { // recheck for lost race
            T t = delegate.get();
            value = t;

So, **FastAPI** will take care of filtering out all the data that is not declared in the output model (using Pydantic).

### `response_model` or Return Type { #response-model-or-return-type }

In this case, because the two models are different, if we annotated the function return type as `UserOut`, the editor and tools would complain that we are returning an invalid type, as those are different classes.

        //
        // Note that there is a race condition here which can result in missing
        // a cyclic edge: it's possible for two threads to simultaneous find
        // "safe" edges which together form a cycle. Preventing this race
        // condition efficiently without _introducing_ deadlock is probably
        // tricky. For now, just accept the race condition---missing a warning

      } finally {
        monitor.leave();
      }
    } else {
      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.

    /*
     * The initialization of seenExceptionsField has to be more complicated than we'd like. The
     * simple approach would be for each caller CAS it from null to a Set populated with its
     * exception. But there's another race: If the first thread fails with an exception and a second
     * thread immediately fails with the same exception:
     *
     * Thread1: calls setException(), which returns true, context switch before it can CAS

# Sub-dependencies { #sub-dependencies }

You can create dependencies that have **sub-dependencies**.

They can be as **deep** as you need them to be.

**FastAPI** will take care of solving them.

## First dependency "dependable" { #first-dependency-dependable }

You could create a first dependency ("dependable") like:

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial005_an_py310.py hl[8:9] *}

 *   {@literal @Override} public int hashCode() {...}
 *   ...
 * }
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>No cascading checks are performed against the return values of methods unless the method is a
 * static factory method. Neither are semantics of mutation methods such as {@code
 * someList.add(obj)} checked. For more detailed discussion of supported and unsupported cases, see

		initialStackSnapShot.DetectLeak(t)
	}
}

// list of functions to be ignored from the stack trace.
// Leak detection is done when tests are run, should ignore the tests related functions,
// and other runtime functions while identifying leaks.
var ignoredStackFns = []string{
	"",
	// Below are the stacks ignored by the upstream leaktest code.
	"testing.Main(",
	"testing.tRunner(",
	"testing.tRunner(",
	"runtime.goexit",

But I'll show you how to improve that next. 🤓

## Custom Operation IDs and Better Method Names { #custom-operation-ids-and-better-method-names }

You can **modify** the way these operation IDs are **generated** to make them simpler and have **simpler method names** in the clients.

      // the extra memory consumption and indirection are more
      // expensive than the extra volatile reads.
      long nanos = expirationNanos;
      long now = System.nanoTime();
      if (nanos == 0 || now - nanos >= 0) {
        synchronized (lock) {
          if (nanos == expirationNanos) { // recheck for lost race
            T t = delegate.get();
            value = t;