* call cancel() and be unable to cancel the delegate.
   * There are a number of ways to solve this, none of which are very pretty, and it is currently
   * believed to be a purely theoretical problem (since the other actions should supply sufficient
   * write-barriers).
   */

  @LazyInit private @Nullable ListenableFuture<V> delegateRef;
  @LazyInit private @Nullable ScheduledFuture<?> timer;

   * for an RPC may wait for a similar call that requests a long timeout, or a call by an
   * unprivileged user may return a resource accessible only to a privileged user making a similar
   * call. To prevent this problem, create a key object that includes all values that affect the
   * result of the query. Or use {@code LoadingCache.get(K)}, which lacks the ability to refer to
   * state other than that in the key.
   *

/**
 * Unit test of {@link MutableTypeToInstanceMap}.
 *
 * @author Ben Yu
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class MutableTypeToInstanceMapTest extends TestCase {

  @AndroidIncompatible // problem with suite builders on Android
  public static Test suite() {
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
    suite.addTestSuite(MutableTypeToInstanceMapTest.class);

    suite.addTest(
        MapTestSuiteBuilder.using(

## Website

[fess.codelibs.org](https://fess.codelibs.org/)

## Probleme/Fragen

[discuss.codelibs.org](https://discuss.codelibs.org/c/FessEN/)

## Erste Schritte

                // Don't want to have two workers pulling from the queue.
                return;
              } else {
                // Increment the run counter to avoid the ABA problem of a submitter marking the
                // thread as QUEUED after it already ran and exhausted the queue before returning
                // from execute().
                workerRunCount++;

- kube- and cloud-controller-manager can now listen on ports up to 65535 rather than 32768, solving problems with operating systems that request these higher ports.. ([#65860](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65860), [@sttts](https://github.com/sttts))

    assertEquals(Integer.MAX_VALUE, ms.tailMultiset("a", CLOSED).size());
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  @AndroidIncompatible // Reflection bug, or actual binary compatibility problem?
  public void testElementSetBridgeMethods() {
    for (Method m : TreeMultiset.class.getMethods()) {
      if (m.getName().equals("elementSet") && m.getReturnType().equals(SortedSet.class)) {
        return;
      }

 * {@code .compare(a.foo, b.foo)} but you actually wrote {@code .compare(a.foo, a.foo)} or {@code
 * .compare(a.foo, b.bar)}. {@code ComparisonChain} also has a potential performance problem that
 * {@code Comparator} doesn't: it evaluates all the parameters of all the {@code .compare} calls,
 * even when the result of the comparison is already known from previous {@code .compare} calls.
 * That can be expensive.
 *

         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope
         * that this will suffice. I have not even benchmarked with different size limits.
         */
        if (validClasses.size() > 1000) {
          validClasses.clear();
        }

     * A service in this state has completed execution normally. It does minimal work and consumes
     * minimal resources.
     */
    TERMINATED,

    /**
     * A service in this state has encountered a problem and may not be operational. It cannot be
     * started nor stopped.
     */
    FAILED,
  }

  /**
   * A listener for the various state changes that a {@link Service} goes through in its lifecycle.
   *