attributes:
      label: Has this idea, or one like it, been proposed before?
      description: If so, how does this proposal differ?
      placeholder: |
       Yes or No

       If yes, 
        1. Mention the related proposals 
        2. then describe how this proposal differs       
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: error-handling-proposal
    attributes:

                rootCause = rootCause.getCause();
            }
            String message = rootCause.getMessage();
            assertTrue("Exception message should mention unregistered class: " + message,
                    message != null && (message.contains("not registered") || message.contains("Class is not registered")
                            || message.contains("unregistered")));

        IllegalArgumentException ex = assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> RequestParam.valueOf(badName));
        assertTrue(ex.getMessage().contains(badName), "Exception message should mention the bad name");
    }

    // Edge/Invalid: empty string is invalid for valueOf
    @ParameterizedTest
    @EmptySource
    @DisplayName("valueOf(\"\") throws IllegalArgumentException for empty input")

	var dateStr string
	err := d.DecodeElement(&dateStr, &startElement)
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}
	// While AWS documentation mentions that the date specified
	// must be present in ISO 8601 format, in reality they allow
	// users to provide RFC 3339 compliant dates.
	retDate, err := amztime.ISO8601Parse(dateStr)
	if err != nil {

	var dateStr string
	err := d.DecodeElement(&dateStr, &startElement)
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}
	// While AWS documentation mentions that the date specified
	// must be present in ISO 8601 format, in reality they allow
	// users to provide RFC 3339 compliant dates.
	expDate, err := time.Parse(time.RFC3339, dateStr)
	if err != nil {

                Strings.getOEMBytes(TEST_STRING, mockConfig);
            });

            assertTrue(exception.getMessage().contains("Unsupported OEM encoding"), "Exception should mention unsupported encoding");
            assertTrue(exception.getCause() instanceof UnsupportedEncodingException, "Cause should be UnsupportedEncodingException");
        }
    }

    @Nested

   * eliminate duplicate keys (for buildKeepingLast()) then we have to ensure that a later call to
   * buildOrThrow() will still throw as if the duplicates had not been eliminated. And the exception
   * message must mention two values that were associated with the duplicate key in two different
   * calls to Builder.put (though we don't really care *which* two values if there were more than

    }

    @Test
    public void test_messageWithSpecialCharacters() {
        // Setup
        final String message = "Query error: field:\"test value\" AND category:[A TO Z] OR tag:#hashtag @mention $special %wildcard";
        final VaMessenger<FessMessages> messageCode = messages -> messages.addErrorsInvalidQueryUnknown(UserMessages.GLOBAL_PROPERTY_KEY);

        try {
            FileUtil.readBytes(largeFile);
            fail("Expected IORuntimeException for large file");
        } catch (final IORuntimeException e) {
            assertTrue("Error message should mention file size", e.getMessage().contains("File too large"));
        }
    }

    /**
     * Test readBytes with file within size limit
     *
     * @throws Exception
     */
    @Test

            assertTrue(
                    description.toLowerCase().contains("compatibility")
                            || description.toLowerCase().contains("fix"),
                    "Description should mention compatibility or fix");
        }
    }