checkNotNull(mergeFunction, "mergeFunction");

    /*
     * No mutable Table exactly matches the insertion order behavior of ImmutableTable.Builder, but
     * the Builder can't efficiently support merging of duplicate values.  Getting around this
     * requires some work.
     */

    return Collector.of(
        ImmutableTableCollectorState<R, C, V>::new,
        (state, input) ->
            state.put(

        assertNull(facetInfo.size);
        assertNull(facetInfo.minDocCount);
        assertNull(facetInfo.sort);
        assertNull(facetInfo.missing);
    }

    // Test init with duplicate and empty field names
    public void test_init_withDuplicateAndEmptyFieldNames() {
        FessConfig fessConfig = new FessConfig.SimpleImpl() {
            @Override
            public String getQueryFacetFields() {

   * collection in unspecified order.
   *
   * @param collection the elements that the set should contain
   * @return a new {@code CompactHashSet} containing those elements (minus duplicates)
   */
  public static <E extends @Nullable Object> CompactHashSet<E> create(
      Collection<? extends E> collection) {
    CompactHashSet<E> set = createWithExpectedSize(collection.size());
    set.addAll(collection);

        return buf.toString().trim();
    }

    /**
     * Replaces duplicate hosts in the URL using the duplicate host helper.
     *
     * @param url the URL to process
     * @return the URL with duplicate hosts replaced
     */
    protected String replaceDuplicateHost(final String url) {
        try {
            // remove duplicate host

   * referencing the type variables seem worthwhile.
   */
  final void checkNoDuplicate(R rowKey, C columnKey, @Nullable V existingValue, V newValue) {
    checkArgument(
        existingValue == null,
        "Duplicate key: (row=%s, column=%s), values: [%s, %s].",
        rowKey,
        columnKey,
        newValue,
        existingValue);
  }

  // redeclare to satisfy our test for b/310253115
  @Override

    }
  }

  // TODO: test adding element of wrong type

  /**
   * Returns {@link Method} instances for the {@code setCount()} tests that assume multisets support
   * duplicates so that the test of {@code Multisets.forSet()} can suppress them.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static List<Method> getSetCountDuplicateInitializingMethods() {
    return asList(

    checkNotNull(mergeFunction, "mergeFunction");

    /*
     * No mutable Table exactly matches the insertion order behavior of ImmutableTable.Builder, but
     * the Builder can't efficiently support merging of duplicate values.  Getting around this
     * requires some work.
     */

    return Collector.of(
        ImmutableTableCollectorState<R, C, V>::new,
        (state, input) ->
            state.put(

                field.setAccessible(true);
                String value = (String) field.get(null);
                assertFalse("Duplicate value found: " + value + " for field: " + field.getName(), values.contains(value));
                values.add(value);
            }
        }
    }

    /**

				for idx, column := range columns {
					if field := sch.LookUpField(column); field != nil && field.Readable {
						fields[idx] = field
						if count, ok := matchedFieldCount[column]; ok {
							// handle duplicate fields
							for _, selectField := range sch.Fields {
								if selectField.DBName == column && selectField.Readable {
									if count == 0 {
										matchedFieldCount[column]++
										fields[idx] = selectField

        }
        if (elements.length > 0) {
          multiset1.add(elements[0]);
        }
        if (elements.length > 1) {
          /*
           * When a test requests a multiset with duplicates, our plan of
           * "add an extra item 0 to A and an extra item 1 to B" really means
           * "add an extra item 0 to A and B," which isn't what we want.
           */