assertEquals(SMB_COM_NT_CANCEL, commandField.getByte(cancel));
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @ValueSource(ints = { 0, 1, 100, 255, 65535 })
        @DisplayName("Should handle different MID values")
        void testConstructorWithVariousMids(int mid) throws Exception {
            // Given
            Configuration config = mock(Configuration.class);
            when(config.getPid()).thenReturn(12345);

        assertTrue(result < dst.length);
        assertEquals((byte) 0x04, dst[0]); // First buffer format byte
    }

    /**
     * Test writeBytesWireFormat with different buffer offsets
     */
    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test writeBytesWireFormat with different buffer offsets")
    public void testWriteBytesWireFormatWithOffset() {
        // Given
        String oldFileName = "old.txt";
        String newFileName = "new.txt";

                Arguments.of("VERYLONGNAMETEST", 0x20, "ANOTHERLONGNAME", 0x00));
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("writeTrailerWireFormat should handle different buffer offsets")
    void testWriteTrailerWireFormatWithOffset() {
        SessionRequestPacket packet =

     * <p>
     * <b>NOTE:</b> This will result in a different instance of Model being returned!!!
     *
     * @param model The inbound Model instance, to serialize and reference for expression resolution
     * @param context The other context map to be used during resolution
     *
     * @return The resolved instance of the inbound Model. This is a different instance!
     *

  public void testForEachKnownOrder() {
    List<E> elements = new ArrayList<>();
    collection.forEach(elements::add);
    List<E> expected = Helpers.copyToList(getOrderedElements());
    assertEquals("Different ordered iteration", expected, elements);
  }

    if (expected.equals(in)) {
      assertSame(in, out);
    } else {
      assertEquals(expected, out);
    }
  }

  // Test collapse() a little differently than the rest, as we really want to
  // cover lots of different configurations of input text
  public void testCollapse() {
    // collapsing groups of '-' into '_' or '-'
    doTestCollapse("-", "_");
    doTestCollapse("x-", "x_");

        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle different buffer positions correctly")
        void testReadBytesWireFormatDifferentPositions() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
            byte[] buffer = new byte[1024];

            // Test at different positions
            int[] positions = { 0, 50, 100, 500, 800 };

            for (int position : positions) {

      }

    val trustManager = get().platformTrustManager()
    val sslContext = get().newSSLContext()
    sslContext.init(null, null, null)

    // new client, may share all same fields but likely different connection pool
    assertNotSame(
      client.routeDatabase,
      OkHttpClient
        .Builder()
        .build()
        .routeDatabase,
    )

import junit.framework.TestCase;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Tests our AtomicHelper fallback strategy in AggregateFutureState.
 *
 * <p>On different platforms AggregateFutureState uses different strategies for its core
 * synchronization primitives. The strategies are all implemented as subtypes of AtomicHelper and

There have been many tools created before that have helped inspire its creation.

I have been avoiding the creation of a new framework for several years. First I tried to solve all the features covered by **FastAPI** using many different frameworks, plug-ins, and tools.