### Package Requirements { #package-requirements }

You would normally have the **package requirements** for your application in some file.

It would depend mainly on the tool you use to **install** those requirements.

The most common way to do it is to have a file `requirements.txt` with the package names and their versions, one per line.

        // shouldn't be a problem unless the buffer is shrinking each call
        return in.read(cbuf, off, Math.max(len - 1024, 0));
      }
    };
  }

  /** Wrap an appendable in an appendable to defeat any type specific optimizations. */
  private static Appendable wrapAsGenericAppendable(Appendable a) {
    return new Appendable() {

      @Override
      public Appendable append(CharSequence csq) throws IOException {

        // shouldn't be a problem unless the buffer is shrinking each call
        return in.read(cbuf, off, Math.max(len - 1024, 0));
      }
    };
  }

  /** Wrap an appendable in an appendable to defeat any type specific optimizations. */
  private static Appendable wrapAsGenericAppendable(Appendable a) {
    return new Appendable() {

      @Override
      public Appendable append(CharSequence csq) throws IOException {

import java.util.logging.Level;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * The {@code CycleDetectingLockFactory} creates {@link ReentrantLock} instances and {@link
 * ReentrantReadWriteLock} instances that detect potential deadlock by checking for cycles in lock
 * acquisition order.
 *
 * <p>Potential deadlocks detected when calling the {@code lock()}, {@code lockInterruptibly()}, or

 * equality for both keys and values, unlike {@code ForwardingMap}.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods and the collection views they return are not guaranteed to be
 * thread-safe, even when all of the methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Mike Bostock
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @since 2.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
/*
 * We provide and encourage use of ForwardingNavigableSet over this class, but we still provide this

     * in this scope are not part of any path scope.
     */
    NONE("none", false),

    /**
     * Undefined. When no scope is explicitly given, UNDEFINED will be used, but its meaning will depend on
     * whether the DependencyCoordinates is used in dependency management, in which case it means the scope is not
     * explicitly managed by this managed dependency, or as a real dependency, in which case, the scope

    class SignatureTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should detect signed packet")
        void testIsSigned() {
            response.setFlagsForTest(ServerMessageBlock2.SMB2_FLAGS_SIGNED);

            assertTrue(response.isSigned());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should detect unsigned packet")
        void testIsNotSigned() {
            response.setFlagsForTest(0);

 * comparator is not consistent with {@code equals}.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods are not guaranteed to be thread-safe, even when all of the
 * methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Mike Bostock
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @since 2.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
public abstract class ForwardingMapEntry<K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>

//     - object_data := DAREv2_Dec(ObjectKey, enc_object_data)
//     Output: object_data
//
// ## SSE-S3
//
// SSE-S3 can use either a master key or a KMS as root-of-trust.
// The en/decryption slightly depens upon which root-of-trust is used.
//
// ### SSE-S3 and single master key
//
// The master key is used to derive unique object- and key-encryption-keys.
// SSE-S3 with a single master key works as SSE-C where the master key is

In that case, you wouldn't have to worry about any of this. 🤷

///

### Examples of Previous Steps Strategies { #examples-of-previous-steps-strategies }

This will **depend heavily** on the way you **deploy your system**, and it would probably be connected to the way you start programs, handling restarts, etc.

Here are some possible ideas: