Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
      with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
      institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
      cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
      or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct

   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
   */
  private final Equivalence<? super T> equivalence;

  private final String relationshipName;
  private final String hashName;

            throw new RobotsTxtException("Failed to parse robots.txt.", e);
        }
    }

    /**
     * Extracts the value from a line using the given pattern.
     * @param pattern the pattern to match against
     * @param line the line to extract the value from
     * @return the extracted value, or null if no match
     */
    protected String getValue(final Pattern pattern, final String line) {

 *
 * <p>
 * The class uses synchronization to ensure thread safety when accessing and modifying the URL queue.
 * It also checks for duplicate URLs before adding them to the queue,
 * both within the queue itself and against previously accessed URLs stored in the {@link MemoryDataHelper}.
 * </p>
 *
 */
/**
 * This class is an implementation of {@link UrlQueueService}.
 */

     * has marked as favorites.
     *
     * @param userCode the unique code identifying the user
     * @param urlList the list of URLs to check against the user's favorites
     * @return a list of URLs from the input list that are in the user's favorites, or an empty list if the user is not found or has no matching favorites
     */

    if (obj instanceof Subscriber) {
      Subscriber that = (Subscriber) obj;
      // Use == so that different equal instances will still receive events.
      // We only guard against the case that the same object is registered
      // multiple times
      return target == that.target && method.equals(that.method);
    }
    return false;
  }

  /**

public interface PredecessorsFunction<N> {

  /**
   * Returns all nodes in this graph adjacent to {@code node} which can be reached by traversing
   * {@code node}'s incoming edges <i>against</i> the direction (if any) of the edge.
   *
   * <p>Some algorithms that operate on a {@code PredecessorsFunction} may produce undesired results

        // respectively. Using a simple replacement of these patterns will allow them
        // to specify the absolute path to these files in a customized components.xml
        // file. Ideally, we'd do full pattern-evaluation against the sysprops, but this
        // is a first step. There are several replacements below, in order to normalize
        // the path character before we operate on the string as a regex input, and

         * Android), the built-in TypeVariable's equals() method doesn't recognize instances of our
         * TypeVariable implementation. This is a problem because users compare TypeVariables from
         * the JDK against TypeVariables returned by TypeResolver. To work with all JDK versions,
         * TypeResolver must return the appropriate TypeVariable implementation in each of the three
         * possible cases:
         *

      Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
      with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
      institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
      cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
      or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct