const TF_DataType* values,
                                                     int num_values);

// Checks the tensorflow::NodeDef built via the methods above to see if it can
// run on device_type.
TF_CAPI_EXPORT extern void TF_AttrBuilderCheckCanRunOnDevice(
    TF_AttrBuilder* builder, const char* device_type, TF_Status* status);

	}
	type _C_mpz_t [1]_C___mpz_struct

and then replaces each occurrence of a type C.xxx with _C_xxx.

If xxx is data, cgo arranges for C.xxx to refer to the C variable,
with the type translated as described above.  To do this, cgo must
introduce a Go variable that points at the C variable (the linker can
be told to initialize this pointer).  For example, if the gmp library
provided

	mpz_t zero;

under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of
Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following:

    a) Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable
    source code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections 1
    and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or,

    @Mock
    private TransactNamedPipeInputStream mockPipeIn;

    @InjectMocks
    private TransTransactNamedPipeResponse response;

    @BeforeEach
    void setUp() {
        // Initialize mocks created above
        MockitoAnnotations.openMocks(this);
        // We need to manually inject the mock as we are not using @InjectMocks on the constructor
        response = new TransTransactNamedPipeResponse(mockPipe);
    }

    /**

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

        assertFalse(map.containsKey("maven-test:t09-c"), "maven-test:t09-c is in the project");
    }

    /**
     * Setup exactly the same as the above test, except that the child project
     * now depends upon d, which has a transitive dependency on c.  Even though
     * we did list an exclusion on c, it was only from within the context of

Every effort will be made to handle the bug in as timely a manner as possible, however it's important that we