}
        }

        if (!unhealthy.isEmpty()) {
            log.info("Removed {} unhealthy connections from pool", unhealthy.size());
        }

        // Perform maintenance tasks
        performMaintenanceTasks();
    }

    /**
     * Remove idle connections to free up pool space
     */
    private void removeIdleConnections() {
        long now = System.currentTimeMillis();

      if (compareAndSet(currentRunner, blocker)) {
        // Thread.interrupt can throw arbitrary exceptions due to the nio InterruptibleChannel API
        // This will make sure that tasks don't get stuck busy waiting.
        // Some of this is fixed in jdk11 (see https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8198692) but
        // not all.  See the test cases for examples on how this can happen.
        try {

            }
        } finally {
            lock.writeLock().unlock();
        }
    }

    /**
     * Shuts down the persistent handle manager and its background tasks
     */
    public void shutdown() {
        shutdown = true;
        scheduler.shutdown();
    }

        return !((version == null || version.isEmpty()) || version.startsWith("[") || version.startsWith("("));
    }

    // TODO !![jc; 28-jul-2005] check this; if we're using '-r' and there are aggregator tasks, this will result in
    // weirdness.
    public MavenProject getTopLevelProject() {
        return sortedProjects.stream()
                .filter(MavenProject::isExecutionRoot)
                .findFirst()

# /---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# basicInfoMap: (Required)
#
# The basic information for the tasks of DBFlute.
# You should specify before your first generating.
#
# Core Properties:
# o database: (Required)
# o targetLanguage: (Required)
# o targetContainer: (Required)
# o packageBase: (Required)
#
# Adjustment Properties:

  private val taskFaker = TaskFaker()
  private val taskRunner = taskFaker.taskRunner

  /**
   * Note that we don't use the same [TaskFaker] for this factory. That way off-topic tasks like
   * connection pool maintenance tasks don't add noise to route planning tests.
   */
  private val routePlanner = FakeRoutePlanner(taskFaker = taskFaker)
  private val finder = FastFallbackExchangeFinder(routePlanner, taskRunner)

              }
            },
            directExecutor()));
    thingToCancel[0] = serializer.submit(Callables.returning(null), directExecutor());
    results.add(thingToCancel[0]);
    // Enqueue more than enough tasks to force reentrancy.
    for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
      results.add(serializer.submit(Callables.returning(null), directExecutor()));
    }

    manualExecutorTask[0].run();

 * lock, but also maximizes memory footprint. On the other extreme, one could use a single lock for
 * all tasks, which minimizes memory footprint but also minimizes concurrency. Instead of choosing
 * either of these extremes, {@code Striped} allows the user to trade between required concurrency
 * and memory footprint. For example, if a set of tasks are CPU-bound, one could easily create a

There's a lot of work to do, and for most of it, **YOU** can do it.

The main tasks that you can do right now are:

* [Help others with questions in GitHub](#help-others-with-questions-in-github){.internal-link target=_blank} (see the section above).
* [Review Pull Requests](#review-pull-requests){.internal-link target=_blank} (see the section above).

Those two tasks are what **consume time the most**. That's the main work of maintaining FastAPI.

	}

	expiryWorker := func(wg *sync.WaitGroup, readyCh chan<- struct{}, taskCh <-chan expiryOp, gotExpired *[]ObjectToDelete) {
		defer wg.Done()
		// signal the calling goroutine that the worker is ready tor receive tasks
		close(readyCh)
		var expired []ObjectToDelete
		for t := range taskCh {
			switch v := t.(type) {
			case noncurrentVersionsTask:
				expired = append(expired, v.versions...)
			case expiryTask: