* per call to submit() or submitAsync(), and each instance supports only one call to execute().
   *
   * <p>This class would certainly be simpler and easier to reason about if it were built with
   * ThreadLocal; however, ThreadLocal is not well optimized for the case where the ThreadLocal is
   * non-static, and is initialized/removed frequently - this causes churn in the Thread specific

						this._nextCallbackTimeoutID++;
						this._scheduledTimeouts.set(id, setTimeout(
							() => {
								this._resume();
								while (this._scheduledTimeouts.has(id)) {
									// for some reason Go failed to register the timeout event, log and try again
									// (temporary workaround for https://github.com/golang/go/issues/28975)
									console.warn("scheduleTimeoutEvent: missed timeout event");

 * {@link Collections#singleton(Object)} and <a
 * href="https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/java/util/Set.html#immutable">{@code Set.of}</a>,
 * we recommend using <i>these</i> classes instead for this reason (as well as for consistency).
 *
 * <h4>Creation</h4>
 *
 * <p>Except for logically "abstract" types like {@code ImmutableCollection} itself, each {@code

   * Preconditions.checkNotNull.
   *
   * (verifyNotNull has many fewer "problem" callers, so we could try to be stricter. On the other
   * hand, verifyNotNull arguably has more reason to accept nullable arguments in the first
   * place....)
   */

  /**
   * Ensures that {@code reference} is non-null, throwing a {@code VerifyException} with a default
   * message otherwise.
   *

    if (seq.length() <= maxLength) {
      String string = seq.toString();
      if (string.length() <= maxLength) {
        return string;
      }
      // if the length of the toString() result was > maxLength for some reason, truncate that
      seq = string;
    }

    return new StringBuilder(maxLength)
        .append(seq, 0, truncationLength)
        .append(truncationIndicator)
        .toString();
  }

  /**

   *     guaranteed for the file system and {@link RecursiveDeleteOption#ALLOW_INSECURE} was not
   *     specified
   * @throws IOException if {@code path} or any file in the subtree rooted at it can't be deleted
   *     for any reason
   */
  public static void deleteRecursively(Path path, RecursiveDeleteOption... options)
      throws IOException {
    Path parentPath = getParentPath(path);
    if (parentPath == null) {

   *     guaranteed for the file system and {@link RecursiveDeleteOption#ALLOW_INSECURE} was not
   *     specified
   * @throws IOException if {@code path} or any file in the subtree rooted at it can't be deleted
   *     for any reason
   */
  public static void deleteRecursively(Path path, RecursiveDeleteOption... options)
      throws IOException {
    Path parentPath = getParentPath(path);
    if (parentPath == null) {

    return accessibleObject.getDeclaredAnnotations();
  }

  // We ought to be able to implement GenericDeclaration instead its parent AnnotatedElement.
  // That would give us this method declaration. But for some reason, implementing
  // GenericDeclaration leads to weird errors in Android tests:
  // IncompatibleClassChangeError: interface not implemented
  /** See {@link java.lang.reflect.GenericDeclaration#getTypeParameters()}. */

func loadBucketMetadataParse(ctx context.Context, objectAPI ObjectLayer, bucket string, parse bool) (BucketMetadata, error) {
	b, err := readBucketMetadata(ctx, objectAPI, bucket)
	b.Name = bucket // in-case parsing failed for some reason, make sure bucket name is not empty.
	if err != nil && !errors.Is(err, errConfigNotFound) {
		return b, err
	}
	if err == nil {
		b.defaultTimestamps()
	}

				t.Errorf("Test %d: %s: Expected to fail with <ERROR> \"%s\", but passed instead", i+1, instanceType, testCase.err.Error())
			}
			// Failed as expected, but does it fail for the expected reason.
			if err != nil && !testCase.shouldPass {
				if !strings.Contains(err.Error(), testCase.err.Error()) {