* outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?
     *
     * On the other hand, the current signature is consistent with the similar allAsList method. And

    // This lock protects the task so we can ensure that none of the template methods (startUp,
    // shutDown or runOneIteration) run concurrently with one another.
    // TODO(lukes): why don't we use ListenableFuture to sequence things? Then we could drop the
    // lock.
    private final ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();

    @WeakOuter
    final class Task implements Runnable {

  @GwtIncompatible // Shorts.fromByteArray, Shorts.toByteArray
  public void testByteArrayRoundTrips() {
    Random r = new Random(5);
    byte[] b = new byte[Shorts.BYTES];

    // total overkill, but, it takes 0.1 sec so why not...
    for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
      short num = (short) r.nextInt();
      assertThat(Shorts.fromByteArray(Shorts.toByteArray(num))).isEqualTo(num);

      r.nextBytes(b);

     * `numHashFunctions/bitSize`. So, after n insertions, expected bitCount is `bitSize * (1 - (1 -
     * numHashFunctions/bitSize)^n)`. Solving that for n, and approximating `ln x` as `x - 1` when x
     * is close to 1 (why?), gives the following formula.
     */
    double fractionOfBitsSet = (double) bitCount / bitSize;
    return DoubleMath.roundToLong(
        -Math.log1p(-fractionOfBitsSet) * bitSize / numHashFunctions, RoundingMode.HALF_UP);

// The value returned is the logical OR of multiple possible formats.
// If the value is FormatUnknown, then the input Header cannot be encoded
// and an error is returned explaining why.
//
// As a by-product of checking the fields, this function returns paxHdrs, which
// contain all fields that could not be directly encoded.
// A value receiver ensures that this method does not mutate the source Header.

   *
   * - The map has not switched to delegating to a java.util implementation to mitigate hash
   *   flooding. Callers can confirm this by null-checking delegateOrNull().
   *
   * In an ideal world, we would document why we know those things are true every time we call these
   * methods. But that is a bit too painful....
   */

  private Object requireTable() {
    return requireNonNull(table);
  }

Это особенно заметно при использовании `docker compose`. См. раздел FAQ Docker Compose с техническими подробностями: <a href="https://docs.docker.com/compose/faq/#why-do-my-services-take-10-seconds-to-recreate-or-stop" class="external-link" target="_blank">Почему мои сервисы пересоздаются или останавливаются 10 секунд?</a>.

#### Структура директорий { #directory-structure }

And then waiting 🕙 again for the responses to come back.

This "waiting" 🕙 is measured in microseconds, but still, summing it all, it's a lot of waiting in the end.

That's why it makes a lot of sense to use asynchronous ⏸🔀⏯ code for web APIs.

This kind of asynchronicity is what made NodeJS popular (even though NodeJS is not parallel) and that's the strength of Go as a programming language.

Dies kann insbesondere bei der Verwendung von `docker compose` deutlich spürbar sein. Sehen Sie sich diesen Abschnitt in der Docker Compose-FAQ für technische Details an: <a href="https://docs.docker.com/compose/faq/#why-do-my-services-take-10-seconds-to-recreate-or-stop" class="external-link" target="_blank">Warum benötigen meine Dienste 10 Sekunden, um neu erstellt oder gestoppt zu werden?</a>.

#### Verzeichnisstruktur { #directory-structure }

			return
		}
		if globalBucketVersioningSys.PrefixEnabled(srcBucket, srcObject) && gr != nil {
			// Versioning enabled quite possibly object is deleted might be delete-marker
			// if present set the headers, no idea why AWS S3 sets these headers.
			if gr.ObjInfo.VersionID != "" && gr.ObjInfo.DeleteMarker {
				w.Header()[xhttp.AmzVersionID] = []string{gr.ObjInfo.VersionID}