+ expected
                + ", actual = "
                + actual);
      }
    }

    if (expectedIter.hasNext() || actualIter.hasNext()) {
      // actual either had too few or too many elements
      fail(
          "contents were not equal and in the same order: "
              + "expected = "
              + expected
              + ", actual = "
              + actual);
    }

        // Any PACDecodingException is acceptable for this test
        assertNotNull(e.getMessage());
    }

    @Test
    void testMalformedPac() {
        // Too small to be a valid PAC
        byte[] malformedData = new byte[] { 1, 0, 0, 0 };

        PACDecodingException e = assertThrows(PACDecodingException.class, () -> new Pac(malformedData, keys));

            "A duplicate name exists on the network.", "The network name cannot be found.", "ERRnomoreconn.", "The file exists.",
            "The parameter is incorrect.", "Too many Uids active on this session.",
            "The Uid is not known as a valid user identifier on this session.", "The pipe has been ended.",

            "A duplicate name exists on the network.", "The network name cannot be found.", "ERRnomoreconn.", "The file exists.",
            "The parameter is incorrect.", "Too many Uids active on this session.",
            "The Uid is not known as a valid user identifier on this session.", "The pipe has been ended.",

      if (digit == -1) {
        throw new NumberFormatException(string);
      }
      if (pos > maxSafePos && ParseOverflowDetection.overflowInParse(value, digit, radix)) {
        throw new NumberFormatException("Too large for unsigned long: " + string);
      }
      value = (value * radix) + digit;
    }

    return value;
  }

  /**
   * Returns the unsigned {@code long} value represented by the given string.

      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }
  }

  @Override

}

// StorageFull storage ran out of space.
type StorageFull struct{}

func (e StorageFull) Error() string {
	return "Storage reached its minimum free drive threshold."
}

// SlowDown  too many file descriptors open or backend busy .
type SlowDown struct{}

func (e SlowDown) Error() string {
	return "Please reduce your request rate"
}

// RQErrType reason for read quorum error.

        // Reserved (2 bytes, LE) == 0
        assertEquals(0, SMBUtil.readInt2(buf, offset + 2));
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("writeBytesWireFormat throws when buffer too small")
    void writeBytesWireFormat_throwsIfInsufficientSpace() {
        // Arrange
        Smb2LogoffRequest req = newRequest();
        byte[] tiny = new byte[3]; // less than 4 bytes available

        // Act/Assert

            artifact.addMetadata(new SnapshotArtifactRepositoryMetadata(artifact, snapshot));
        }

        Versioning versioning = new Versioning();
        // TODO Should this be changed for MNG-6754 too?
        versioning.updateTimestamp();
        versioning.addVersion(artifact.getBaseVersion());
        if (artifact.isRelease()) {
            versioning.setRelease(artifact.getBaseVersion());
        }

It uses Marshmallow underneath to do the data validation. And it was created by the same developers.

It's a great tool and I have used it a lot too, before having **FastAPI**.

/// info

Webargs was created by the same Marshmallow developers.

///

/// check | Inspired **FastAPI** to

Have automatic validation of incoming request data.