}

  /**
   * Returns a hash function implementing the Message Authentication Code (MAC) algorithm, using the
   * MD5 (128 hash bits) hash function and the given secret key.
   *
   * <p>If you are designing a new system that needs HMAC, prefer {@link #hmacSha256} or other
   * future-proof algorithms <a
   * href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6151#section-2.3">over {@code hmacMd5}</a>.
   *

first connect fails. This is necessary for IPv4+IPv6 and services hosted in redundant data
centers. OkHttp supports modern TLS features (TLS 1.3, ALPN, certificate pinning). It can be
configured to fall back for broad connectivity.

Using OkHttp is easy. Its request/response API is designed with fluent builders and immutability. It

      // do not retry.
      if (e.cause is CertificateException) {
        return false
      }
    }
    if (e is SSLPeerUnverifiedException) {
      // e.g. a certificate pinning error.
      return false
    }
    // An example of one we might want to retry with a different route is a problem connecting to a

    // 3. This connection's server certificates must cover the new host.
    if (address.hostnameVerifier !== OkHostnameVerifier) return false
    if (!supportsUrl(address.url)) return false

    // 4. Certificate pinning must match the host.
    try {
      address.certificatePinner!!.check(address.url.host, handshake()!!.peerCertificates)
    } catch (_: SSLPeerUnverifiedException) {
      return false
    }

   * the path {@code a/../b}, which {@code simplifyPath} will change to {@code b}. If {@code a} is a
   * symlink to {@code x}, {@code a/../b} may refer to a sibling of {@code x}, rather than the
   * sibling of {@code a} referred to by {@code b}.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  public static String simplifyPath(String pathname) {
    checkNotNull(pathname);
    if (pathname.isEmpty()) {

    TF_Status status;
    // Let this custom device choose the device to pin this op on if it
    // implements the pinning function.
    if (device_.shall_pin_to_this_device != nullptr) {
      return device_.shall_pin_to_this_device(tensorflow::wrap(op), &status);
    }
    return errors::Unimplemented("No custom device pinning implementation.");
  }

 private:
  TFE_Context* context_;
  TFE_CustomDevice device_;
  void* info_;

  /**
   * The HTTP <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-evans-palmer-key-pinning">{@code
   * Public-Key-Pins}</a> header field name.
   *
   * @since 15.0
   */
  public static final String PUBLIC_KEY_PINS = "Public-Key-Pins";

  /**
   * The HTTP <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-evans-palmer-key-pinning">{@code
   * Public-Key-Pins-Report-Only}</a> header field name.
   *
   * @since 15.0

        rel_path = str(py_file)
        if rel_path in all_docs_content:
            continue
        # If this file is inside a directory-based package where any sibling is
        # referenced, keep it (it's likely imported internally).
        parts = py_file.relative_to(docs_src_path).parts
        if len(parts) > 2:
            package_root = docs_src_path / parts[0] / parts[1]

	testCases := []struct {
		objectName string
		shouldPass bool
	}{
		// cases which should pass the test.
		// passing in valid object name.
		{"object", true},
		{"The Shining Script <v1>.pdf", true},
		{"Cost Benefit Analysis (2009-2010).pptx", true},
		{"117Gn8rfHL2ACARPAhaFd0AGzic9pUbIA/5OCn5A", true},
		{"SHØRT", true},
		{"f*le", true},
		{"contains-^-caret", true},

    this because it only occurs if you have proxy configured and you share a connection pool among
    multiple `OkHttpClient` instances.

    This particularly-subtle bug was caused by us assigning each `OkHttpClient` instance its own
    `NullProxySelector` when an explicit proxy is configured. But we don't share connections when
    the proxy selectors are different. Ugh!


## Version 4.2.0