}

    public void test_stackTracePopulated() {
        // Test that stack trace is properly populated
        InvalidAccessTokenException exception = new InvalidAccessTokenException("JWT", "Invalid signature");

        StackTraceElement[] stackTrace = exception.getStackTrace();
        assertTrue(stackTrace.length > 0);

        // First element should be from this test method

// ----------
// Enable server profiling
func (a adminAPIHandlers) StartProfilingHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
	ctx := r.Context()

	// Validate request signature.
	_, adminAPIErr := checkAdminRequestAuth(ctx, r, policy.ProfilingAdminAction, "")
	if adminAPIErr != ErrNone {
		writeErrorResponseJSON(ctx, w, errorCodes.ToAPIErr(adminAPIErr), r.URL)
		return
	}

2. The id_token self-contains the authorization information in a manner that can be verified. For example, by encoding authorization information along with a signature into the token.

WSO2 generates tokens in first style by default, but if to be used with MinIO we should configure WSO2 to provide JWT tokens instead.

### 3. Generate Self-contained Access Tokens

            <signature>
              <groupId>com.toasttab.android</groupId>
              <artifactId>gummy-bears-api-23</artifactId>
              <version>0.12.0</version>
              <!-- TODO(cpovirk): In principle, it would make sense to *also* test compatibility with JDK 1.8, since guava-android also has JRE users. -->
            </signature>
            <ignores>

    /**
     * Extended attributes are supported flag.
     */
    int FLAGS2_EXTENDED_ATTRIBUTES = 0x0002;
    /**
     * Security signatures are supported flag.
     */
    int FLAGS2_SECURITY_SIGNATURES = 0x0004;
    /**
     * Security signatures are required flag.
     */
    int FLAGS2_SECURITY_REQUIRE_SIGNATURES = 0x0010;
    /**
     * Extended security negotiation is supported flag.
     */

  }

  /**
   * Creates an empty {@code TreeBasedTable} that uses the natural orderings of both row and column
   * keys.
   *
   * <p>The method signature specifies {@code R extends Comparable} with a raw {@link Comparable},
   * instead of {@code R extends Comparable<? super R>}, and the same for {@code C}. That's
   * necessary to support classes defined without generics.
   */

    while (!descendant.equals(ancestor)) {
      classes.add(descendant);
      descendant = descendant.getSuperclass();
    }

    return classes;
  }

  /**
   * Not really a signature -- just the parts that affect whether one method is a fauxveride of a
   * method from an ancestor class.
   *
   * <p>See JLS 8.4.2 for the definition of the related "override-equivalent."
   */

        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Resource Unwrapping Tests")
    class ResourceUnwrappingTest {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should provide unwrap method with correct signature")
        void shouldProvideUnwrapMethod() {
            assertDoesNotThrow(() -> {
                java.lang.reflect.Method unwrapMethod = SmbSession.class.getMethod("unwrap", Class.class);

// SignatureDoesNotMatch - when content md5 does not match with what was sent from client.
type SignatureDoesNotMatch struct{}

func (e SignatureDoesNotMatch) Error() string {
	return "The request signature we calculated does not match the signature you provided. Check your key and signing method."
}

// StorageFull storage ran out of space.
type StorageFull struct{}

func (e StorageFull) Error() string {

                }
            }

            /* Verification fails (w/ W2K3 server at least) if status is not 0. This
             * suggests MS doesn't compute the signature (correctly) for error responses
             * (perhaps for DOS reasons).
             */
            if (digest != null && resp.errorCode == 0) {
                digest.verify(BUF, 4, resp);
            }