from fastapi import Depends, FastAPI, Security
from fastapi.security import APIKeyHeader
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from pydantic import BaseModel

app = FastAPI()

api_key = APIKeyHeader(name="key", description="An API Key Header")


class User(BaseModel):
    username: str


def get_current_user(oauth_header: str = Security(api_key)):
    user = User(username=oauth_header)
    return user

**FastAPI** будет знать, что может использовать класс `OAuth2PasswordBearer` (объявленный в зависимости) для определения схемы безопасности в OpenAPI, потому что он наследуется от `fastapi.security.oauth2.OAuth2`, который, в свою очередь, наследуется от `fastapi.security.base.SecurityBase`.

/// info | Detalhes Técnicos

O **FastAPI** saberá que pode usar a classe `OAuth2PasswordBearer` (declarada em uma dependência) para definir o esquema de segurança no OpenAPI porque ela herda de `fastapi.security.oauth2.OAuth2`, que por sua vez herda de `fastapi.security.base.SecurityBase`.

blank_issues_enabled: false
contact_links:
  - name: Security Contact
    about: Please report security vulnerabilities to security@tiangolo.com
  - name: Question or Problem
    about: Ask a question or ask about a problem in GitHub Discussions.
    url: https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/discussions/categories/questions
  - name: Feature Request

{* ../../docs_src/security/tutorial002.py hl[25] *}

## 获取用户

`get_current_user` 使用创建的（伪）工具函数，该函数接收 `str` 类型的令牌，并返回 Pydantic 的 `User` 模型：

{* ../../docs_src/security/tutorial002.py hl[19:22,26:27] *}

## 注入当前用户

在*路径操作* 的 `Depends` 中使用 `get_current_user`：

{* ../../docs_src/security/tutorial002.py hl[31] *}

注意，此处把 `current_user` 的类型声明为 Pydantic 的 `User` 模型。

L46

name: OSV-Scanner Scheduled Scan

on:
  schedule:
    - cron: 0 4 * * 1

permissions:
  # Require writing security events to upload SARIF file to security tab
  security-events: write
  # Only need to read contents
  contents: read

jobs:
  scan-scheduled:
    if: github.repository == 'tensorflow/tensorflow'

# Ref: https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/issues/14454

from typing import Annotated

from fastapi import Depends, FastAPI, Security
from fastapi.security import OAuth2AuthorizationCodeBearer
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from inline_snapshot import snapshot

oauth2_scheme = OAuth2AuthorizationCodeBearer(
    authorizationUrl="api/oauth/authorize",
    tokenUrl="/api/oauth/token",
    scopes={"read": "Read access", "write": "Write access"},

 */
package jcifs.util;

import java.security.GeneralSecurityException;
import java.security.KeyStore;
import java.security.SecureRandom;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap;

import javax.crypto.SecretKey;
import javax.crypto.spec.SecretKeySpec;
import javax.security.auth.DestroyFailedException;

 */
package jcifs.pac.kerberos;

import java.security.Key;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Set;

import javax.security.auth.Subject;
import javax.security.auth.kerberos.KerberosKey;
import javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext;
import javax.security.auth.login.LoginException;

/**

## About security, APIs, and docs { #about-security-apis-and-docs }

Hiding your documentation user interfaces in production *shouldn't* be the way to protect your API.

That doesn't add any extra security to your API, the *path operations* will still be available where they are.

If there's a security flaw in your code, it will still exist.