input         []lex.Token
	inputPos      int
	pendingLabels []string // Labels to attach to next instruction.
	labels        map[string]*obj.Prog
	toPatch       []Patch
	addr          []obj.Addr
	arch          *arch.Arch
	ctxt          *obj.Link
	firstProg     *obj.Prog
	lastProg      *obj.Prog
	dataAddr      map[string]int64 // Most recent address for DATA for this symbol.

### Ein Prozess pro Container

In einem solchen Szenario möchten Sie wahrscheinlich **einen einzelnen (Uvicorn-)Prozess pro Container** haben, da Sie die Replikation bereits auf Cluster ebene durchführen würden.

Por exemplo, vamos supor que você possua 4 endpoints na sua API (*operações de rota*):

* `/items/public/`
* `/items/private/`
* `/users/{user_id}/activate`
* `/items/pro/`

Você poderia adicionar diferentes requisitos de permissão para cada um deles utilizando apenas dependências e sub-dependências:

```mermaid
graph TB

current_user(["current_user"])

     */
    protected void parseProjectProperties(final Path propPath) {
        try (final InputStream in = Files.newInputStream(propPath)) {
            final Properties prop = new Properties();
            prop.load(in);
            version = prop.getProperty("fess.version", "0.0.0");
            final String[] values = version.split("\\.");
            majorVersion = Integer.parseInt(values[0]);

	}
	if err := DB.AutoMigrate(&CompositeKeyProduct{}); err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("failed to migrate, got error %v", err)
	}

	prod := &CompositeKeyProduct{
		LanguageCode: 56,
		Code:         "Code56",
		Name:         "ProductName56",
	}
	if err := DB.Create(&prod).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("failed to create, got error %v", err)
	}

	newProd := &CompositeKeyProduct{}

		// hence not included in the collector path.
		pathComponents = pathComponents[:bucketIdx]
	}

	innerHandler := h.handle(pathComponents, isListingRequest, buckets)

	// Add tracing to the prom. handler
	tracedHandler := http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
		tc, ok := r.Context().Value(mcontext.ContextTraceKey).(*mcontext.TraceCtxt)
		if ok {
			tc.FuncName = "handler.MetricsV3"

                this.renderTimePicker('right');
                if (!this.endDate) {
                    this.container.find('.right .calendar-time select').prop('disabled', true).addClass('disabled');
                } else {
                    this.container.find('.right .calendar-time select').prop('disabled', false).removeClass('disabled');
                }
            }
            if (this.endDate)

* `/users/{user_id}/activate`
* `/items/pro/`

그 다음 각각에 대해 그저 의존성과 하위 의존성을 사용하여 다른 권한 요구 사항을 추가할 수 있을 겁니다:

```mermaid
graph TB

current_user(["current_user"])
active_user(["active_user"])
admin_user(["admin_user"])
paying_user(["paying_user"])

public["/items/public/"]
private["/items/private/"]
activate_user["/users/{user_id}/activate"]
pro_items["/items/pro/"]

current_user --> active_user

    executor.execute(task);
    assertEquals(1, numCalls.get());
  }

  /*
   * Under Android, MyError propagates up and fails the test?
   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Does this matter to prod users, or is it just a feature of our testing
   * environment? If the latter, maybe write a custom Executor that avoids failing the test when it
   * sees an Error?
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible

* `/users/{user_id}/activate`
* `/items/pro/`

そして、依存関係とサブ依存関係だけで、それぞれに異なるパーミッション要件を追加することができます:

```mermaid
graph TB

current_user(["current_user"])
active_user(["active_user"])
admin_user(["admin_user"])
paying_user(["paying_user"])

public["/items/public/"]
private["/items/private/"]
activate_user["/users/{user_id}/activate"]
pro_items["/items/pro/"]

current_user --> active_user