Long.MIN_VALUE,
        Long.MAX_VALUE
      };

  private static final double[] VALUES = Doubles.concat(NUMBERS, new double[] {NaN});

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (double value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Doubles.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Double.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (long value : VALUES) {
      assertWithMessage("hashCode for " + value)
          .that(Longs.hashCode(value))
          .isEqualTo(Long.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")

  private static final short GREATEST = Short.MAX_VALUE;

  private static final short[] VALUES = {LEAST, (short) -1, (short) 0, (short) 1, GREATEST};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (short value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Shorts.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Short.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

      return Types.toString(type);
    }

    boolean jdkTypeDuplicatesOwnerName() {
      return true;
    }
  }

  /**
   * Per <a href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/1635">issue 1635</a>, In JDK 1.7.0_51-b13,
   * {@link TypeVariableImpl#equals(Object)} is changed to no longer be equal to custom TypeVariable
   * implementations. As a result, we need to make sure our TypeVariable implementation respects

        for (Annotation a : classOrMethod.getDeclaredAnnotations()) {
          /*
           * We avoid reflecting on NullMarked because its @Target(..., MODULE) causes problems
           * under JDK 8.
           */
          if (!(a instanceof NullMarked)
              && a.annotationType().isAnnotationPresent(TesterAnnotation.class)) {
            annotations.add(a);
          }
        }

        Long.MIN_VALUE,
        Long.MAX_VALUE
      };

  private static final float[] VALUES = Floats.concat(NUMBERS, new float[] {NaN});

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (float value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Floats.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Float.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

  private static final int GREATEST = Integer.MAX_VALUE;

  private static final int[] VALUES = {LEAST, (int) -1, (int) 0, (int) 1, GREATEST};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (int value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Ints.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Integer.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

        Long.MIN_VALUE,
        Long.MAX_VALUE
      };

  private static final float[] VALUES = Floats.concat(NUMBERS, new float[] {NaN});

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (float value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Floats.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Float.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

 * finalization to happen. However, a call to {@code System.gc()} is specified to be no more than a
 * hint, so this technique may fail at the whim of the JDK implementation, for example if a user
 * specified the JVM flag {@code -XX:+DisableExplicitGC}. But in practice, it works very well for
 * ordinary tests.
 *

      return Types.toString(type);
    }

    boolean jdkTypeDuplicatesOwnerName() {
      return true;
    }
  }

  /**
   * Per <a href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/1635">issue 1635</a>, In JDK 1.7.0_51-b13,
   * {@link TypeVariableImpl#equals(Object)} is changed to no longer be equal to custom TypeVariable
   * implementations. As a result, we need to make sure our TypeVariable implementation respects