* @return HTML response for the search results
     */
    @Execute
    @Secured({ ROLE, ROLE + VIEW })
    public HtmlResponse search(final SearchForm form) {
        copyBeanToBean(form, keyMatchPager, op -> op.exclude(Constants.PAGER_CONVERSION_RULE));
        return asHtml(path_AdminKeymatch_AdminKeymatchJsp).renderWith(data -> {
            searchPaging(data, form);
        });
    }

    /**

     */
    @Execute
    @Secured({ ROLE, ROLE + VIEW })
    public HtmlResponse search(final SearchForm form) {
        copyBeanToBean(form, elevateWordPager, op -> op.exclude(Constants.PAGER_CONVERSION_RULE));
        return asHtml(path_AdminElevateword_AdminElevatewordJsp).renderWith(data -> {
            searchPaging(data, form);
        });
    }

    /**

import org.apache.maven.artifact.Artifact;
import org.apache.maven.artifact.repository.ArtifactRepository;
import org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.ArtifactResolutionException;

/**
 * Occurs when ranges exclude each other and no valid value remains.
 *
 */
public class OverConstrainedVersionException extends ArtifactResolutionException {
    public OverConstrainedVersionException(String msg, Artifact artifact) {

    contents = new HashMap<>();
    for (Element key : elems.getValuesInSet()) {
      contents.put(key, key);
    }
    map = mapsImpl.create(contents);
  }

  @Benchmark
  @Footprint(exclude = Element.class)
  public Map<Element, Element> create() throws Exception {
    return mapsImpl.create(contents);
  }

  @Benchmark
  public int iterate() {
    long retVal = 0;

     * {@code groupId:artifactId:version[:scope]}
     * <p>
     * When verbose mode is enabled, additional details are included with the following format:
     * <ul>
     *   <li>For included dependencies: {@code groupId:artifactId:version[:scope] (details)}</li>
     *   <li>For omitted dependencies: {@code (groupId:artifactId:version[:scope] - details)}</li>
     * </ul>

import org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger;
import org.codelibs.fess.util.ComponentUtil;

/**
 * Job for purging expired thumbnail files from the system.
 * This job removes thumbnail files that have exceeded their configured expiration time
 * to prevent disk space from being consumed by old thumbnails.
 */
public class PurgeThumbnailJob {
    /** Logger instance for this class */

        conditions.put("epq", new String[] { "exact phrase" });
        conditions.put("oq", new String[] { "word1 word2" });
        conditions.put("nq", new String[] { "exclude" });
        conditions.put("filetype", new String[] { "pdf" });
        conditions.put("sitesearch", new String[] { "example.com" });

        final String result = getAsQuery(conditions);

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see