override fun authenticate(
            route: Route?,
            response: Response,
          ): Request? {
            if (response.request.header("Authorization") != null) {
              return null // Give up, we've already attempted to authenticate.
            }

            println("Authenticating for response: $response")
            println("Challenges: ${response.challenges()}")

        byte[] byteData = buffer.array();

        // Call the method
        int bytesRead = response.readBytesWireFormat(byteData, 0);

        // Assertions
        // readBytesWireFormat returns bytes processed up to null terminator
        assertEquals(14, bytesRead); // 8 bytes key + 6 bytes domain name
        assertArrayEquals(encryptionKey, serverData.encryptionKey);
        assertEquals("DOMAIN", serverData.oemDomainName);
    }

   *
   * We get plan0 and plan1 from the route planner.
   * We get plan2 as a follow-up to plan1, typically retry the same IP but different TLS.
   * We get plan3 as a retry of plan0, which was canceled when it lost the race.
   *
   * This test confirms that we prefer to do the TLS follow-up (plan2) before the TCP retry (plan3).
   * It also confirms we enforce the 250 ms delay in each race.
   */
  @Test

  final boolean threadStarted;

  /** Constructs a new queue. */
  public FinalizableReferenceQueue() {
    // We could start the finalizer lazily, but I'd rather it blow up early.
    queue = new ReferenceQueue<>();
    frqRef = new PhantomReference<>(this, queue);
    boolean threadStarted = false;
    try {
      startFinalizer.invoke(null, FinalizableReference.class, queue, frqRef);

5. **Resources**: Test resources are properly managed and cleaned up

## Contributing

When adding new tests:
1. Follow the existing naming convention: `test_<method>_<scenario>_<expectedResult>`
2. Add clear JavaDoc comments explaining the test purpose
3. Ensure tests are independent and can run in any order
4. Clean up resources in finally blocks or use try-with-resources

  public Authenticate() {
    client = new OkHttpClient.Builder()
        .authenticator((route, response) -> {
          if (response.request().header("Authorization") != null) {
            return null; // Give up, we've already attempted to authenticate.
          }

          System.out.println("Authenticating for response: " + response);
          System.out.println("Challenges: " + response.challenges());

    // The values here look like 111...11101...010 in binary, where the initial 111...1110 takes
    // up exactly as many bits as can be represented in the significand (24 for float, 53 for
    // double). That final 0 should be rounded up to 1 because the remaining bits make that number
    // slightly nearer.
    long floatConversionTest = 0xfffffe8000000002L;

@echo off
@REM set title of command window
title %0
@REM enable echoing by setting MAVEN_BATCH_ECHO to 'on'
@if "%MAVEN_BATCH_ECHO%"=="on" echo %MAVEN_BATCH_ECHO%

@setlocal

server in a given timeframe for whatever reasons (networking issue, machine
failure, etc.). Normally when kube-up script will encounter even one NotReady
node it will fail, even though the cluster most likely will be working. We
added an environmental variable to kube-up ALLOWED\_NOTREADY\_NODES that
defines the number of nodes that if not Ready in time won’t cause kube-up
failure.
  * “kubectl rolling-update” only supports Replication Controllers (it doesn’t

* Azure cloudprovider: Reduce the polling delay for all azure clients to 5 seconds. This should speed up some operations at the cost of some additional quota. ([#43699](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/43699), [@colemickens](https://github.com/colemickens))
* kubeadm: clean up exited containers and network checkpoints ([#43836](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/43836), [@yujuhong](https://github.com/yujuhong))