* <h3>Extension</h3>
 *
 * If you want a class like {@code FluentFuture} but with extra methods, we recommend declaring your
 * own subclass of {@link ListenableFuture}, complete with a method like {@link #from} to adapt an
 * existing {@code ListenableFuture}, implemented atop a {@link ForwardingListenableFuture} that
 * forwards to that future and adds the desired methods.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

   * run finishes before the limit is reached, this method returns or a wrapped exception is
   * propagated. If, on the other hand, the time limit is reached, we attempt to abort the run, and
   * throw a {@link TimeoutException} to the caller.
   *
   * <p>The difference with {@link #runWithTimeout(Runnable, long, TimeUnit)} is that this method
   * will ignore interrupts on the current thread.

 *       the {@code Converter} type using a mocking framework.
 *   <li>Extend this class and implement its {@link #doForward} and {@link #doBackward} methods.
 *   <li><b>Java 8+ users:</b> you may prefer to pass two lambda expressions or method references to
 *       the {@link #from from} factory method.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Using a converter:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Convert one instance in the "forward" direction using {@code converter.convert(a)}.

    for (Method method : getInstanceMethodsToTest(instance.getClass(), minimalVisibility)) {
      testMethod(instance, method);
    }
  }

  ImmutableList<Method> getInstanceMethodsToTest(Class<?> c, Visibility minimalVisibility) {
    ImmutableList.Builder<Method> builder = ImmutableList.builder();
    for (Method method : minimalVisibility.getInstanceMethods(c)) {

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

   * iterators that don't support {@code remove()}, but all other methods are supported by the map
   * and its views. When given a key that doesn't satisfy the predicate, the map's {@code put()} and
   * {@code putAll()} methods throw an {@link IllegalArgumentException}.
   *
   * <p>When methods such as {@code removeAll()} and {@code clear()} are called on the filtered map