- Reverted a kubectl azure auth module change where oidc claim spn: prefix was omitted resulting a breaking behavior with existing Azure AD OIDC enabled api-server ([#87507](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/87507), [@weinong](https://github.com/weinong)) [SIG API Machinery, Auth and Cloud Provider]...

* In case StorageObjectInUse feature is disabled and Persistent Volume (PV) or Persistent Volume Claim (PVC) contains a finalizer and the PV or PVC is deleted it is not automatically removed from the system. Now, it is automatically removed. ([#62938](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/62938), [@pospispa](https://github.com/pospispa))

  behind the `DynamicResourceAllocation` feature gate).
  The new API is now more flexible than the existing Device Plugins feature of Kubernetes because it
  allows Pods to request (claim) special kinds of resources, which can be available at node level, cluster
  level, or following any other model you implement.' ([#111023](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/111023), [@pohly](https://github.com/pohly))

    * $ kubectl get pv --show-labels
    * NAME           CAPACITY   ACCESSMODES   STATUS    CLAIM            REASON    AGE       LABELS

* Azure file persistent volumes can use a new `secretNamespace` field to reference a secret in a different namespace than the one containing their bound persistent volume claim. The azure file persistent volume provisioner honors a corresponding `secretNamespace` storage class parameter to determine where to place secrets containing the storage account key. ([#47660](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/47660), ...

- Fix: skip instance not found when decoupling vmss from lb (#105666, @nilo19) [SIG Cloud Provider]
- Fixed a bug that prevents PersistentVolume that has a Claim UID which doesn't exist in local cache but exists in ETCD from being updated to Released phase. (#105211, @xiaopingrubyist) [SIG Apps]

* 📝 Remove obsolete `url` field in error responses in docs. PR [#13655](https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pull/13655) by [@Taoup](https://github.com/Taoup).
* 📝 Bring the `scope` claim in line with the standard in `docs_src/security/tutorial005.py`. PR [#11189](https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pull/11189) by [@DurandA](https://github.com/DurandA).