RequestOptionCall<IndexRequestBuilder> entityCall) {
        return doBatchDelete(new BulkList<>(list, call, entityCall), null);
    }

    // #pending create, modify, remove

    unfiltered.put("three", 3);
    unfiltered.put("four", 4);
    assertEquals(ImmutableMap.of("two", 2, "three", 3, "four", 4), unfiltered);
    assertEquals(ImmutableMap.of("three", 3, "four", 4), filtered);

    unfiltered.remove("three");
    assertEquals(ImmutableMap.of("two", 2, "four", 4), unfiltered);
    assertEquals(ImmutableMap.of("four", 4), filtered);

    unfiltered.clear();
    assertEquals(ImmutableMap.of(), unfiltered);

			staleDisks[j] = badDisk{nil}
		}

		staleWriters := make([]io.Writer, len(staleDisks))
		for i, disk := range staleDisks {
			if disk == nil {
				continue
			}
			os.Remove(pathJoin(disk.String(), "testbucket", "testobject"))
			staleWriters[i] = newBitrotWriter(disk, "", "testbucket", "testobject", erasure.ShardFileSize(test.size), test.algorithm, erasure.ShardSize())
		}

   change the cluster root credentials since they were used to en/decrypt the IAM data.
   So, both - the old and new credentials - had to be present at the same time during a rotation
   and the old credentials had to be removed once the rotation completed. This process is now gone.
   The root credentials can now be changed easily.

> Does this mean I need an enterprise KMS setup to run MinIO (securely)?

		./mc cat /tmp/expanded_*.log
	fi
	sleep 1
done

kill $pid_1
kill $pid_2

sleep 5

(minio server --address ":9001" http://localhost:9001/tmp/xl/{11...30}/disk{0...3} 2>&1 >/tmp/removed.log) &
pid=$!

sleep 5
export MC_HOST_myminio="http://minioadmin:minioadmin@localhost:9001/"

./mc ready myminio

decom_user_count=$(./mc admin user list myminio/ | wc -l)

// error returned in IAM subsystem when a non-empty group needs to be
// deleted.
var errGroupNotEmpty = errors.New("Specified group is not empty - cannot remove it")

// error returned in IAM subsystem when a group is disabled
var errGroupDisabled = errors.New("Specified group is disabled")

// error returned in IAM subsystem when policy doesn't exist.

responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in response to any instances of unacceptable behavior.

Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or permanently any contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate, threatening,...

            ArtifactRepositoryPolicy releases);

    /**
     * Calculates the effective repositories for the given input repositories which are assumed to be already mirrored
     * (if applicable). This process will essentially remove duplicate repositories by merging them into one equivalent
     * repository. It is worth to point out that merging does not simply choose one of the input repositories and

            RequestOptionCall<IndexRequestBuilder> entityCall) {
        return doBatchDelete(new BulkList<>(list, call, entityCall), null);
    }

    // #pending create, modify, remove

            RequestOptionCall<IndexRequestBuilder> entityCall) {
        return doBatchDelete(new BulkList<>(list, call, entityCall), null);
    }

    // #pending create, modify, remove