* documentation for this follows from https://git-scm.com/docs/gitrepository-layout and https://git-scm.com/docs/git-worktree.
             *
             * There are two cases to consider:
             *  - a plain repository with .git directory at the root of the working tree
             *  - a worktree with a plain text .git file at the root of the working tree
             *

import org.junit.runners.Parameterized.Parameters;

/**
 * Test for {@link Network} methods which have default implementations. Currently those
 * implementations are in {@link AbstractNetwork}; in future they might be in {@link Network}
 * itself, once we are willing to use Java 8 default methods.
 */
@AndroidIncompatible
// TODO(cpovirk): Figure out Android JUnit 4 support. Does it work with Gingerbread? @RunWith?

import java.io.ObjectInputStream;
import java.io.OutputStream;
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.nio.charset.Charset;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Funnels for common types. All implementations are serializable.
 *
 * @author Dimitris Andreou
 * @since 11.0
 */
@Beta
public final class Funnels {
  private Funnels() {}

  /** Returns a funnel that extracts the bytes from a {@code byte} array. */

@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
@NullUnmarked
public class PackageSanityTests extends AbstractPackageSanityTests {
  public PackageSanityTests() {
    // package private classes like FunctionalEquivalence are tested through the public API.
    publicApiOnly();
  }

    validations:
      required: false
  - type: textarea
    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context
      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish? What other alternatives have you considered?
        Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world
    validations:

    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context (optional)
      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish?
        Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world
    validations:
      required: false
  - type: input
    id: page
    attributes:

     */

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
        return this.addr.hashCode();
    }

    /**
     * Compare two addresses for equality. Two <code>UniAddress</code>s are equal
     * if they are both <code>UniAddress</code>' and refer to the same IP address.
     */
    @Override
    public boolean equals(final Object obj) {

  }

  /**
   * Tests that the method {@code putEdge} will silently add the missing nodes to the graph, then
   * add the edge connecting them. We are not using the proxy methods here as we want to test {@code
   * putEdge} when the end-points are not elements of the graph.
   */
  @Test
  public void putEdge_nodesNotInGraph() {
    assume().that(graphIsMutable()).isTrue();

    graphAsMutableGraph.addNode(N1);

	ErrInvalidEncryptionParameters: {
		Code:           "InvalidRequest",
		Description:    "The encryption parameters are not applicable to this object.",
		HTTPStatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
	},
	ErrInvalidEncryptionParametersSSEC: {
		Code:           "InvalidRequest",
		Description:    "SSE-C encryption parameters are not supported on replicated bucket.",
		HTTPStatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
	},

            assertEquals(0, flag & (flag - 1), "Flag should be power of 2: " + Integer.toHexString(flag));
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should validate all constants are unique")
        void shouldHaveUniqueConstants() {
            int[] accessConstants = { ACE.FILE_READ_DATA, ACE.FILE_WRITE_DATA, ACE.FILE_APPEND_DATA, ACE.FILE_READ_EA, ACE.FILE_WRITE_EA,