*   user task -- which means that we already got past this code (or else we exited early
       *   above))
       */
      // Unconditionally set; there is no risk of throwing away a queued task from another thread,
      // because in order for the current task to run on this executor the previous task must have

        + " * _1.0_ May 6, 2013\n"
        + " * _1.1_ June 15, 2013\n"
        + " * _1.2_ August 11, 2013\n";

    Request request = new Request.Builder()
        .url("https://api.github.com/markdown/raw")
        .post(RequestBody.create(postBody, MEDIA_TYPE_MARKDOWN))
        .build();

    try (Response response = client.newCall(request).execute()) {
      if (!response.isSuccessful()) throw new IOException("Unexpected code " + response);

import com.google.common.collect.testing.AbstractCollectionTester;
import java.util.Set;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")

            <li><a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="openPage('menu-2-2.html')">Menu 2-2</a></li>
        </ul>
    </div>
    <div id="content"></div>
    <div id="form">
        <form method="post" action="form.html">
            <input type="text" name="query" value="aaa">
            <input type="hidden" name="secret" value="xxx">
            <input type="submit" name="Submit">
        </form>
    </div>

 * method) of a list. Can't be invoked directly; please see {@link
 * com.google.common.collect.testing.ListTestSuiteBuilder}.
 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")

 * annotation implies nothing about the quality or performance of the API in question, only the fact
 * that it is not "API-frozen."
 *
 * <p>It is generally safe for <i>applications</i> to depend on beta APIs, at the cost of some extra
 * work during upgrades. However it is generally inadvisable for <i>libraries</i> (which get
 * included on users' CLASSPATHs, outside the library developers' control) to do so.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion

 * annotation implies nothing about the quality or performance of the API in question, only the fact
 * that it is not "API-frozen."
 *
 * <p>It is generally safe for <i>applications</i> to depend on beta APIs, at the cost of some extra
 * work during upgrades. However it is generally inadvisable for <i>libraries</i> (which get
 * included on users' CLASSPATHs, outside the library developers' control) to do so.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion

	for _, ep := range endpointServerPools {
		for _, endpoint := range ep.Endpoints {
			if endpoint.IsLocal {
				continue
			}
			if seenClient.Contains(endpoint.Host) {
				continue
			}
			seenClient.Add(endpoint.Host)
			clnts = append(clnts, &bootstrapRESTClient{gm.Connection(endpoint.GridHost())})
		}
	}
	return clnts

        })).status(Status.OK).result());
    }

    // POST /api/admin/fileconfig/setting
    /**
     * Creates a new file configuration setting.
     *
     * @param body file configuration setting data to create
     * @return JSON response with created setting ID and status
     */
    @Execute
    public JsonResponse<ApiResult> post$setting(final CreateBody body) {
        validateApi(body, messages -> {});

🚥 👆 💚 ✍ 🌖 🔃 👉 🔢 &amp; 📨 🏑, 👳 <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Methods/POST" class="external-link" target="_blank"><abbr title="Mozilla Developer Network">🏇</abbr> 🕸 🩺 <code>POST</code></a>.

///

/// warning