* either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.bsentity.dbmeta;

import java.time.LocalDateTime;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;

import org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.exentity.ElevateWordToLabel;
import org.dbflute.Entity;
import org.dbflute.dbmeta.AbstractDBMeta;

 * either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.bsentity;

import java.time.LocalDateTime;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;

import org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.allcommon.EsAbstractEntity;
import org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.bsentity.dbmeta.KeyMatchDbm;

/**

   * addition, a series of disjoint linked lists of "siblings", each containing
   * the values for a specific key, is used to implement {@link
   * ValueForKeyIterator} in constant time.
   */

  static final class Node<K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      extends SimpleEntry<K, V> {
    @Nullable Node<K, V> next; // the next node (with any key)

 * either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.bsentity;

import java.time.LocalDateTime;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;

import org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.allcommon.EsAbstractEntity;
import org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.bsentity.dbmeta.AccessTokenDbm;

/**

    * So, by using FastAPI you are saving development time, bugs, lines of code, and you would probably get the same performance (or better) you would if you didn't use it (as you would have to implement it all in your code).

    public String value;

    /** The sort order of the label type. */
    public String sortOrder;

    /** The creator of the label type. */
    public String createdBy;

    /** The created time of the label type. */
    public String createdTime;

    /** The version number of the label type. */
    public String versionNo;

    /**
     * Clears the pager fields.
     */
    public void clear() {

    public String id;

    /** Suggest word for search filtering. */
    public String suggestWord;

    /** Creator username for search filtering. */
    public String createdBy;

    /** Creation time for search filtering. */
    public String createdTime;

    /** Version number for search filtering. */
    public String versionNo;

    /**
     * Default constructor for BadWordPager.
     */

 * either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.bsentity.dbmeta;

import java.time.LocalDateTime;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;

import org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.exentity.CrawlingInfo;
import org.dbflute.Entity;
import org.dbflute.dbmeta.AbstractDBMeta;

     */
    @Override
    public int read(final byte[] b) throws IOException {
        return inputStream.read(b);
    }

    /**
     * Repositions this stream to the position at the time the mark method was last called.
     *
     * @throws IOException if this stream has not been marked or if the mark has been invalidated
     */
    @Override
    public synchronized void reset() throws IOException {

        }
        return sb.toString();
      }
    },
    // It really seems like this should be faster than TO_BYTE_ARRAY_NEW_STRING.  But it just isn't
    // my best guess is that the jdk authors have spent more time optimizing that callpath than this
    // one. (StringCoding$StringDecoder vs. StreamDecoder).  StringCoding has a ton of special cases
    // theoretically we could duplicate all that logic here to try to beat 'new String' or at least