}

  /**
   * Tests equality of {@link Hashing#goodFastHash} instances. This test must be separate from
   * {@link #testSeededHashFunctionEquals} because the parameter to {@code goodFastHash} is a size,
   * not a seed, and because that size is rounded up. Thus, {@code goodFastHash} instances with
   * different parameters can be equal. That fact is a problem for {@code
   * testSeededHashFunctionEquals}.
   */

	// Calculate signature.
	newSignature := getSignature(signingKey, stringToSign)

	return newSignature
}

// calculateSeedSignature - Calculate seed signature in accordance with
//   - http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/sigv4-streaming.html
//
// returns signature, error otherwise if the signature mismatches or any other
// error while parsing and validating.

- Fixes an issue where default RBAC policy could fail to reconcile on API server startup if an error was encountered ([#101954](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/101954), [@voutcn](https://github.com/voutcn)) [SIG Auth]
- Improve speed of vSphere PV provisioning and reduce number of API calls ([#102351](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/102351), [@gnufied](https://github.com/gnufied)) [SIG Cloud Provider and Storage]

      totalCount += count;
      return this;
    }

    AvlNode<E> add(
        Comparator<? super E> comparator, @ParametricNullness E e, int count, int[] result) {
      /*
       * It speeds things up considerably to unconditionally add count to totalCount here,
       * but that destroys failure atomicity in the case of count overflow. =(
       */
      int cmp = comparator.compare(e, getElement());

     */
    // NB: yes, this is surprisingly high, but that's what the experiments said was necessary
    // Raising this number slows the worst-case contains behavior, speeds up hashFloodingDetected,
    // and reduces the false-positive probability.
    static final int MAX_RUN_MULTIPLIER = 13;

    /**

 * randomly ordered data (the probability decreases faster than exponentially in N), but if you are
 * passing in unsanitized user data then a malicious user could force it. A light shuffle of the
 * data using an unpredictable seed should normally be enough to thwart this attack.
 *
 * <p>The time taken to compute multiple quantiles on the same dataset using {@link Scale#indexes

# ----------------------------------------------------------
#                                                    Suggest
#                                                     ------

# Seed value for popular word suggestion.
suggest.popular.word.seed=0
# Tags for popular word suggestion.
suggest.popular.word.tags=
# Fields for popular word suggestion.
suggest.popular.word.fields=
# Excluded words for popular word suggestion.

        ).build(),
    )
    server.enqueue(
      MockResponse
        .Builder()
        .addHeader("Content-Encoding: gzip")
        .body(gzip("b"))
        .build(),
    )

    // Seed the pool with a bad connection.
    assertContent("a", getResponse(newRequest("/")))

    // Give the server time to disconnect.
    Thread.sleep(500)

     * Get the value for the key 'suggest.popular.word.seed'. <br>
     * The value is, e.g. 0 <br>
     * comment: Seed value for popular word suggestion.
     * @return The value of found property. (NotNull: if not found, exception but basically no way)
     */
    String getSuggestPopularWordSeed();

    /**
     * Get the value for the key 'suggest.popular.word.seed' as {@link Integer}. <br>
     * The value is, e.g. 0 <br>

	c.Assert(err, nil)
	c.Assert(response.StatusCode, http.StatusOK)

	var buffer bytes.Buffer
	// data to be written into buffer.
	data := "1234567890"
	// seed the random number generator once.
	rand.Seed(3)
	// generate a random number between 13 and 200.
	randInt := getRandomRange(13, 200, -1)
	// write into buffer till length of the buffer is greater than the generated random number.