private enum Timeout {
    MIN(Long.MIN_VALUE, "-oo"),
    MINUS_SMALL(-SMALL_TIMEOUT_MILLIS, "-" + SMALL_TIMEOUT_MILLIS + "ms"),
    ZERO(0L, "0ms"),
    SMALL(SMALL_TIMEOUT_MILLIS, SMALL_TIMEOUT_MILLIS + "ms"),
    LARGE(UNEXPECTED_HANG_DELAY_MILLIS * 2, (2 * UNEXPECTED_HANG_DELAY_MILLIS) + "ms"),
    MAX(Long.MAX_VALUE, "+oo");

    final long millis;
    final String label;

    Timeout(long millis, String label) {

			// in obtaining service accounts by this cred.
			cred.ParentUser = lookupResult.NormDN

			// Set this value to LDAP groups, LDAP user can be part
			// of large number of groups
			cred.Groups = targetGroups

			// Set the newly generated credentials, policyName is empty on purpose
			// LDAP policies are applied automatically using their ldapUser, ldapGroups
			// mapping.

  private enum Timeout {
    MIN(Long.MIN_VALUE, "-oo"),
    MINUS_SMALL(-SMALL_TIMEOUT_MILLIS, "-" + SMALL_TIMEOUT_MILLIS + "ms"),
    ZERO(0L, "0ms"),
    SMALL(SMALL_TIMEOUT_MILLIS, SMALL_TIMEOUT_MILLIS + "ms"),
    LARGE(UNEXPECTED_HANG_DELAY_MILLIS * 2, (2 * UNEXPECTED_HANG_DELAY_MILLIS) + "ms"),
    MAX(Long.MAX_VALUE, "+oo");

    final long millis;
    final String label;

    Timeout(long millis, String label) {

         * than a handful of exceptions. But it seems prudent to set a cap on how many we'll cache.
         * This avoids out-of-control memory consumption, and it keeps the cache from growing so
         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope

 * particular example can be written as just:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * ContiguousSet.closed(5, 42)
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> Be extremely careful what you do with conceptually large instances (such as
 * {@code ContiguousSet.create(Range.greaterThan(0), DiscreteDomain.integers()}). Certain operations
 * on such a set can be performed efficiently, but others (such as {@link Set#hashCode} or {@link

  // Warning messages describe a problem the client making the API request should correct or be aware of.
  // Limit warnings to 120 characters if possible.
  // Warnings over 256 characters and large numbers of warnings may be truncated.
  // +optional
  repeated string warnings = 7;
}

// AdmissionReview describes an admission review request/response.
message AdmissionReview {

  // Warning messages describe a problem the client making the API request should correct or be aware of.
  // Limit warnings to 120 characters if possible.
  // Warnings over 256 characters and large numbers of warnings may be truncated.
  // +optional
  repeated string warnings = 7;
}

// AdmissionReview describes an admission review request/response.
message AdmissionReview {

  // the list automatically by PodDisruptionBudget controller after some time.
  // If everything goes smooth this map should be empty for the most of the time.
  // Large number of entries in the map may indicate problems with pod deletions.
  // +optional
  map<string, k8s.io.apimachinery.pkg.apis.meta.v1.Time> disruptedPods = 2;

  // Number of pod disruptions that are currently allowed.

@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public abstract class Striped<L> {
  /**
   * If there are at least this many stripes, we assume the memory usage of a ConcurrentMap will be
   * smaller than a large array. (This assumes that in the lazy case, most stripes are unused. As
   * always, if many stripes are in use, a non-lazy striped makes more sense.)
   */
  private static final int LARGE_LAZY_CUTOFF = 1024;

 * particular example can be written as just:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * ContiguousSet.closed(5, 42)
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> Be extremely careful what you do with conceptually large instances (such as
 * {@code ContiguousSet.create(Range.greaterThan(0), DiscreteDomain.integers()}). Certain operations
 * on such a set can be performed efficiently, but others (such as {@link Set#hashCode} or {@link