* either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.suggest.exception;

/**
 * Exception thrown when there is an issue with the suggest settings.
 * This exception extends {@link RuntimeException}, so it is an unchecked exception.
 *
 * <p>There are three constructors available for this exception:</p>
 * <ul>

import jcifs.CIFSException;

/**
 * Unified authentication provider interface for SMB authentication
 *
 * This interface provides a consistent authentication mechanism across
 * SMB1, SMB2, and SMB3 protocols, addressing the issue of multiple
 * scattered authentication implementations.
 */
public interface AuthenticationProvider {

    /**
     * Authentication type enumeration
     */
    enum AuthType {

        .Builder()
        .serialNumber(1L)
        .certificateAuthority(1)
        .commonName("root")
        .build()

    // Add a good intermediate CA, and have that issue a good certificate to localhost. Prepare an
    // SSL context for an HTTP client under attack. It includes the trusted CA and a pinned
    // certificate.
    val goodIntermediateCa =
      HeldCertificate
        .Builder()

```gradle
dependencies {
  test 'com.google.guava:guava-testlib:33.4.8-jre'
}
```

## Links

-   [GitHub project](https://github.com/google/guava)
-   [Issue tracker: Report a defect or feature request](https://github.com/google/guava/issues/new)
-   [StackOverflow: Ask "how-to" and "why-didn't-it-work" questions](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/ask?tags=guava+java)

  }

  compileOptions {
    targetCompatibility(JavaVersion.VERSION_11)
    sourceCompatibility(JavaVersion.VERSION_11)
  }

  kotlinOptions {
    jvmTarget = JavaVersion.VERSION_11.toString()
  }

  // issue merging due to conflict with httpclient and something else
  packagingOptions.resources.excludes += setOf(
    "META-INF/DEPENDENCIES"
  )
}


dependencies {
  val okhttpLegacyVersion = "3.12.12"

* Now, if that solved their problem, you can ask them to:

    * In GitHub Discussions: mark the comment as the **answer**.
    * In GitHub Issues: **close** the issue.

## Watch the GitHub repository { #watch-the-github-repository }

I (the author, [@tiangolo](https://x.com/tiangolo)) will review it thoroughly and get back to you.

## Public Discussions

Please restrain from publicly discussing a potential security vulnerability. 🙊

  }

  testOptions {
    targetSdk = 34
    unitTests.isIncludeAndroidResources = true
  }

  kotlinOptions {
    jvmTarget = JavaVersion.VERSION_11.toString()
  }

  // issue merging due to conflict with httpclient and something else
  packagingOptions.resources.excludes += setOf(
    "META-INF/DEPENDENCIES",
    "META-INF/LICENSE.md",
    "META-INF/LICENSE-notice.md",
    "README.txt",

* Wenn es tatsächlich das Problem gelöst hat, können Sie sie darum bitten:

    * In GitHub-Diskussionen: den Kommentar als **Antwort** zu markieren.
    * In GitHub-Issues: Das Issue zu **schließen**.

## Das GitHub-Repository beobachten

* Fix kubelet start failure issue on Azure Stack due to InstanceMetadata setting ([#74936](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/74936), [@rjaini](https://github.com/rjaini))
* fix parse devicePath issue on Azure Disk ([#74499](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/74499), [@andyzhangx](https://github.com/andyzhangx))