hostname: String,
    response: Response,
  ): List<InetAddress> {
    if (response.cacheResponse == null && response.protocol !== Protocol.HTTP_2 && response.protocol !== Protocol.QUIC) {
      Platform.get().log("Incorrect protocol: ${response.protocol}", Platform.WARN)
    }

    response.use {
      if (!response.isSuccessful) {
        throw IOException("response: " + response.code + " " + response.message)
      }

noncurrentDays=$(./mc ilm rule list siteb/bucket --json | jq '.config.Rules[0].NoncurrentVersionExpiration.NoncurrentDays')
if [ $expDays -ne 3 ]; then
	echo "BUG: Incorrect expiry days '${expDays}' set for 'siteb'"
	exit 1
fi
if [ $noncurrentDays -ne 2 ]; then
	echo "BUG: Incorrect non current expiry days '${noncurrentDays}' set for siteb"
	exit 1
fi

## Make sure transition rule not replicated to siteb

   * should use this method over {@link #setCountCheckReturnValue(Object, int)} when they expect
   * {@code setCount()} to throw an exception, as checking the return value could produce an
   * incorrect error message like "setCount() should return the original count" instead of the
   * message passed to a later invocation of {@code fail()}, like "setCount should throw
   * UnsupportedOperationException."
   */

		"Invalid WORM value",
		"Please check the passed value",
		"WORM can only accept `on` and `off` values. To enable WORM, set this value to `on`",
	)

	ErrInvalidConfigDecryptionKey = newErrFn(
		"Incorrect encryption key to decrypt internal data",
		"Please set the correct default KMS key value or the correct root credentials for older MinIO versions.",

    /** The key of the message: The Luhn Modulo 11 checksum of {value} is incorrect. */
    public static final String CONSTRAINTS_LuhnCheck_MESSAGE = "{constraints.LuhnCheck.message}";

    /** The key of the message: The Modulo 10 checksum of {value} is incorrect. */
    public static final String CONSTRAINTS_Mod10Check_MESSAGE = "{constraints.Mod10Check.message}";

          <association>
            <type>RepositoryPolicy</type>
          </association>
        </field>
      </fields>
      <!-- prevent modello generation of an incorrect equals method. Could be avoided by using <identity/> tags to mark ID as the only identity field -->
      <codeSegments>
        <codeSegment>
          <version>1.0.0</version>
          <code><![CDATA[

		rs:        ReplicationState{ReplicationStatusInternal: "arn1=PENDING;", Targets: map[string]replication.StatusType{"arn1": "PENDING"}},
		expStatus: replication.Pending,
	},
	{ // 3. replication status for one target - incorrect format
		name:      "replication status for one target",
		rs:        ReplicationState{ReplicationStatusInternal: "arn1=PENDING"},
		expStatus: replication.StatusType(""),
	},

	// sequent of operations:
	// 1) pipe.Write()
	// 2) pipe.Close()
	// Now pipe.Close() can return before the data is read on the other end of the pipe and written to the disk
	// Hence an immediate Read() on the file can return incorrect data.
	if b.canClose != nil {
		b.canClose.Wait()
	}

	// Recycle the buffer.
	if b.byteBuf != nil {
		globalBytePoolCap.Load().Put(b.byteBuf)
		b.byteBuf = nil
	}
	return err
}

///

Теперь получим данные о пользователе из (ненастоящей) базы данных, используя `username` из поля формы.

Если такого пользователя нет, то мы возвращаем ошибку "Incorrect username or password" (неверное имя пользователя или пароль).

Для ошибки используем исключение `HTTPException`:

{* ../../docs_src/security/tutorial003_an_py310.py hl[3,79:81] *}

    assertTrue(
        "non-empty multiset.entrySet() iterator.hasNext() returned false", iterator.hasNext());
    assertEquals(
        "multiset.entrySet() iterator.next() returned incorrect entry",
        Multisets.immutableEntry(e0(), 1),
        iterator.next());
    assertFalse(
        "size 1 multiset.entrySet() iterator.hasNext() returned true after next()",
        iterator.hasNext());