.filter(rap -> !allAvailableProfiles.contains(rap))
                .collect(toSet());

        if (!notFoundRequiredProfiles.isEmpty()) {
            // Use SLF4J formatter for consistency with warnings reported by logger
            final String message = MessageFormatter.format(
                            "The requested profiles {} could not be activated or deactivated because they do not"

We don't really need to inherit from `HeroBase` because we are re-declaring all the fields. I'll leave it inheriting just for consistency, but this is not necessary. It's more a matter of personal taste. 🤷

The fields of `HeroUpdate` are:

* `name`
* `age`
* `secret_name`

// RQErrType reason for read quorum error.
type RQErrType int

const (
	// RQInsufficientOnlineDrives - not enough online drives.
	RQInsufficientOnlineDrives RQErrType = 1 << iota
	// RQInconsistentMeta - inconsistent metadata.
	RQInconsistentMeta
)

func (t RQErrType) String() string {
	switch t {
	case RQInsufficientOnlineDrives:
		return "InsufficientOnlineDrives"
	case RQInconsistentMeta:

        assertTrue(id.length() <= 445);
    }

    @Test
    public void testCreateSuggestTextIdConsistency() {
        // Test that same input always produces same output
        String text = "consistency test";
        String id1 = SuggestUtil.createSuggestTextId(text);
        String id2 = SuggestUtil.createSuggestTextId(text);
        assertEquals(id1, id2);
    }

    public static final int SMB2_LEASE_FULL           = 0x07;  // RWH
}
```

### 3.2 Lease Versions
- **Lease V1**: Basic lease support (SMB 3.0)
- **Lease V2**: Adds epoch support for better consistency (SMB 3.0.2+)

## 4. Data Structures

### 4.1 Lease Key Structure
```java
package jcifs.internal.smb2.lease;

import java.security.SecureRandom;
import java.util.Arrays;

public class Smb2LeaseKey {

            assertFalse((executeMask & ACE.FILE_WRITE_DATA) != 0, "Execute should not include write access");
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should validate documented bit comment consistency")
        void shouldValidateDocumentedBitComments() {
            // Verify that comments in source match actual constant values (not bit positions)

   * even for funny strings composed by (possibly unmatched, and mostly illegal) surrogate
   * characters. (But doesn't test that they do the right thing - just their consistency).
   */
  private static void assertHashStringWithSurrogatesEquivalence(
      HashFunction hashFunction, Random random) {
    int size = random.nextInt(8) + 1;
    char[] chars = new char[size];

* Also don't worry about style rules, there are already automatized tools checking that.

And if there's any other style or consistency need, I'll ask directly for that, or I'll add commits on top with the needed changes.

### Check the code { #check-the-code }

   *
   * <p>Unlike the other {@code EndpointPair}-accepting methods, this method does not throw if the
   * endpoints are unordered and the network is directed; it simply returns {@code false}. This is
   * for consistency with {@link Graph#hasEdgeConnecting(EndpointPair)} and {@link
   * ValueGraph#hasEdgeConnecting(EndpointPair)}.
   *
   * @since 27.1
   */
  @Override
  boolean hasEdgeConnecting(EndpointPair<N> endpoints);

   * that follow any common prefix, or when one array is a prefix of the other, treats the shorter
   * array as the lesser. For example, {@code [] < ['a'] < ['a', 'b'] < ['b']}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(char[],
   * char[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */