* resolved. If the names cannot be resolved (e.g. due to temporary
     * network failure), the said methods will return default values (usually
     * <code>S-X-Y-Z</code> strings of fragments of).
     * <p>
     * Alternatively <code>getSecurity(true)</code> may be used to resolve all
     * SIDs together and detect network failures.
     *
     * @return array of ACEs
     * @throws IOException if an I/O error occurs

						}
						stopFn(version.Size, err)
						failure = true
						decomLogIf(ctx, err)
						continue
					}
					stopFn(version.Size, nil)
					failure = false
					break
				}
				if ignore {
					continue
				}
				z.poolMetaMutex.Lock()
				z.poolMeta.CountItem(idx, version.Size, failure)
				z.poolMetaMutex.Unlock()
				if failure {
					break // break out on first error
				}

It could be **Docker** directly, **Docker Compose**, **Kubernetes**, a **cloud service**, etc.

In most (or all) cases, there's a simple option to enable running the container on startup and enabling restarts on failures. For example, in Docker, it's the command line option `--restart`.

        } catch (CIFSException e) {
            // Reset handle on connection failure
            this.treeHandle = null;

            // Optimization: Add connection retry for transient failures
            if (isRetryableException(e) && shouldRetryConnection()) {
                log.debug("Retrying tree connection after transient failure", e);
                try {
                    Thread.sleep(100); // Brief delay before retry

            }
        }
    }

    /**
     * Reset the pre-authentication integrity hash to initial state.
     * This should be called on negotiation failures or security errors.
     */
    private void resetPreauthHash() {
        synchronized (this.preauthHashLock) {
            this.preauthIntegrityHash = new byte[64];

- Previously, the scheduling queue didn't notice any extenders' failures, potentially resulting in missed cluster events and Pods rejected by Extenders being stuck in the unschedulable pod pool for up to 5 minutes in the worst-case scenario. Now, the scheduling queue notices extenders' failures and requeues Pods rejected by Extenders appropriately.

    
    A side-effect of using this new image was that the networking packages
    (namely `iptables`) drifted from the versions used in the kube-proxy images.
  
    The following issues were filed on kube-proxy failures when using hyperkube:
    - https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/92275
    - https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/92272
    - https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/92250
  

 * misleading to future readers of the code and of stack traces. See <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/ConditionalFailuresExplained">Conditional failures
 * explained</a> in the Guava User Guide for more advice. Notably, {@link Verify} offers assertions
 * similar to those in this class for non-precondition checks.
 *
 * <h3>{@code java.util.Objects.requireNonNull()}</h3>
 *

* Deprecate the beta labels for zones ("failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone") and  ([#81431](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/81431), [@andrewsykim](https://github.com/andrewsykim))
    * regions ("failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region") in favor of their GA equivalents:
    * "topology.kubernetes.io/zone" and "topology.kubernetes.io/region".

- The scheduling queue didn't notice any extenders' failures, it could miss some cluster events,
  and it could end up Pods rejected by Extenders stuck in unschedulable pod pool in 5min in the worst-case scenario.