//     we find them, regardless of what the address policies need.
    //
    //  2. EVICTABLE: Connections not required by any address policy. This matches connections that
    //     don't participate in any policy, plus connections whose policies won't be violated if the
    //     connection is closed. We only close these if the idle connection limit is exceeded.
    //

* kubectl: don't display an empty list when trying to get a single resource that isn't found ([#28294](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/28294), [@ncdc](https://github.com/ncdc))
* Fix working_set calculation in kubelet ([#29154](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/29154), [@vishh](https://github.com/vishh))

#  See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
#  limitations under the License.
#

# Mimir Daemon properties

# Disable JGroups; we don't want/use LAN cache sharing

aquesta
aquestes
aquests
aquí
baix
cada
cadascú
cadascuna
cadascunes
cadascuns
com
contra
d'un
d'una
d'unes
d'uns
dalt
de
del
dels
des
després
dins
dintre
donat
doncs
durant
e
eh
el
els
em
en
encara
ens
entre
érem
eren
éreu
es
és
esta
està
estàvem
estaven
estàveu
esteu
et
etc
ets
fins
fora

            CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES,
            CollectionFeature.KNOWN_ORDER,
            CollectionFeature.RESTRICTS_ELEMENTS,
            CollectionSize.ANY)
        // don't skip collection tests since checkedQueue() is not tested by TestsForListsInJavaUtil
        .suppressing(suppressForCheckedQueue())
        .createTestSuite();
  }

  public Test testsForArrayDeque() {

  }

  /*
   * Whenever an implementation uses `instanceof` on a parameter instance, the test has to know that
   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {

      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }
  }

    Runnable submittedTask;
    long oldRunCount;
    synchronized (queue) {
      // If the worker is already running (or execute() on the delegate returned successfully, and
      // the worker has yet to start) then we don't need to start the worker.
      if (workerRunningState == RUNNING || workerRunningState == QUEUED) {
        queue.add(task);
        return;
      }

      oldRunCount = workerRunCount;

  A more thorough check will be performed on your pull request automatically.
- [ ] You have run the [Core IT][core-its] successfully.

If your pull request is about ~20 lines of code you don't need to sign an
[Individual Contributor License Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf) if you are unsure
please ask on the developers list.

To make clear that you license your contribution under

        fi
    ;;
    deconfigure|failed-upgrade)
    ;;

    # RedHat ####################################################
    0)
        STOP_REQUIRED=true
    ;;
    1)
        # Don't do anything on upgrade, because the preun script in redhat gets executed after the postinst (madness!)
    ;;

    *)
        echo "pre remove script called with unknown argument \`$1'" >&2
        exit 1
    ;;
esac