```

## `APIRouter` { #apirouter }

Let's say the file dedicated to handling just users is the submodule at `/app/routers/users.py`.

You want to have the *path operations* related to your users separated from the rest of the code, to keep it organized.

But it's still part of the same **FastAPI** application/web API (it's part of the same "Python Package").

   *       AbstractPackageSanityTests} doesn't know how to construct, the test will fail.
   *   <li>If there is no visible constructor or visible static factory method declared by {@code
   *       C}, {@code C} is skipped for serialization test, even if it implements {@link
   *       Serializable}.
   *   <li>Serialization test is not performed on method return values unless the method is a

labels.group_list_name=Name
labels.group_name=Name
labels.group_title_details=Group
labels.related_content_configuration=Related Content
labels.related_content_content=Content
labels.related_content_list_term=Term
labels.related_content_term=Term
labels.related_content_title_details=Related Content
labels.related_query_configuration=Related Query
labels.related_query_list_term=Term
labels.related_query_queries=Queries
labels.related_query_term=Term

.vscode

# This is where the result of the go build goes
/output*/
/_output*/
/_output

# Emacs save files
*~
\#*\#
.\#*

# Vim-related files
[._]*.s[a-w][a-z]
[._]s[a-w][a-z]
*.un~
Session.vim
.netrwhist

# cscope-related files
cscope.*

# Go test binaries
*.test
/hack/.test-cmd-auth

# JUnit test output from ginkgo e2e tests
/junit*.xml

# Mercurial files
**/.hg

	}

	// 5. Check that user can be deleted and verify it.
	err = s.adm.RemoveUser(ctx, accessKey)
	if err != nil {
		c.Fatalf("user could not be deleted: %v", err)
	}
	usersMap, err = s.adm.ListUsers(ctx)
	if err != nil {
		c.Fatalf("error listing: %v", err)
	}
	_, ok = usersMap[accessKey]
	if ok {
		c.Fatalf("user not deleted: %s", accessKey)
	}

    attributes:
      label: What happened?
      description: |
        Please provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner.
        If this matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: expected
    attributes:
      label: What did you expect to happen?

./mc rm minio3/newbucket/README.md
sleep 5

./mc stat --no-list minio2/newbucket/README.md
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
	echo "expected file to be deleted, exiting.."
	exit_1
fi

./mc stat --no-list minio1/newbucket/README.md
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
	echo "expected file to be deleted, exiting.."
	exit_1
fi

sleep 10
./mc stat --no-list minio3/newbucket/lrgfile
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then

		if !meta.IsValid() {
			// Since for majority of the cases erasure.Index matches with erasure.Distribution we can
			// consider the offline disks as consistent.
			continue
		}
		if !meta.Deleted {
			if len(meta.Erasure.Distribution) != len(onlineDisks) {
				// Erasure distribution seems to have lesser
				// number of items than number of online disks.
				inconsistent++
				continue
			}

  @Override
  ListenableScheduledFuture<?> schedule(Runnable command, long delay, TimeUnit unit);

  /**
   * Duration-based overload of {@link #schedule(Runnable, long, TimeUnit)}.
   *
   * @since 29.0
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  default ListenableScheduledFuture<?> schedule(Runnable command, Duration delay) {
    return schedule(command, toNanosSaturated(delay), TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS);
  }

  /**

        return null;
      }
      copy(resourceUrl, file);
    }

    return file;
  }

  /**
   * Creates a new temp dir for testing. The returned directory and all contents of it will be
   * deleted in the tear-down for this test.
   */
  protected final File createTempDir() throws IOException {
    File tempFile = File.createTempFile("IoTestCase", "");
    if (!tempFile.delete() || !tempFile.mkdir()) {