"https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_shell/releases/download/v0.4.1/rules_shell-v0.4.1.tar.gz",
    ),
)

# Initialize toolchains for ML projects.
#
# A hermetic build system is designed to produce completely reproducible builds for C++.
# Details: https://github.com/google-ml-infra/rules_ml_toolchain
tf_http_archive(
    name = "rules_ml_toolchain",

  }

  /**
   * Asserts that the given object is non-null, with a better failure message than {@link
   * TestCase#assertNull(String, Object)}.
   *
   * <p>The {@link TestCase} version (which is from JUnit 3) produces a failure message that does
   * not include the value of the object.
   *
   * @since 33.4.0
   */
  public static void assertNull(String message, Object object) {
    assertEquals(message, null, object);
  }

  }

  /**
   * Asserts that the given object is non-null, with a better failure message than {@link
   * TestCase#assertNull(String, Object)}.
   *
   * <p>The {@link TestCase} version (which is from JUnit 3) produces a failure message that does
   * not include the value of the object.
   *
   * @since 33.4.0
   */
  public static void assertNull(String message, Object object) {
    assertEquals(message, null, object);
  }

    }
    return false;
  }

  // Prevent "missing hashCode" warning by explicitly forcing subclasses implement it
  @Override
  public abstract int hashCode();

  /*
   * The implementation neither produces nor consumes any non-null instance of type C, so
   * casting the type parameter is safe.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
  static <C extends Comparable> Cut<C> belowAll() {
    return (Cut<C>) BelowAll.INSTANCE;

  @GwtIncompatible
    Object writeReplace() {
    return new SerializedForm<V>(map);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible
  @J2ktIncompatible
  /*
   * The mainline copy of ImmutableMapValues doesn't produce this serialized form anymore, though
   * the backport does. For now, we're keeping the class declaration in *both* flavors so that both
   * flavors can read old data or data from the other flavor. However, we strongly discourage

        byte[] encrypted2 = storage.encryptCredentials(plaintext.clone());

        // Should produce different ciphertexts due to random IV
        assertFalse(Arrays.equals(encrypted1, encrypted2), "Different encryptions should produce different ciphertexts");

        // But both should decrypt to same plaintext
        char[] decrypted1 = storage.decryptCredentials(encrypted1);

  }

  public Runnable getTearDown() {
    return tearDown;
  }

  // Features

  private final Set<Feature<?>> features = new LinkedHashSet<>();

  /**
   * Configures this builder to produce tests appropriate for the given features. This method may be
   * called more than once to add features in multiple groups.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public B withFeatures(Feature<?>... features) {

        byte[] buffer2 = new byte[200];
        int encoded2 = request2.encode(buffer2, 0);
        assertEquals(request2.size(), encoded2);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test multiple encodes produce same result")
    void testMultipleEncodesProduceSameResult() {
        // Setup
        String pipeName = "RepeatedEncode";
        long timeout = 3000L;

			Optional:    true,
			Type:        "duration",
		},
		config.HelpKV{
			Key:         apiListQuorum,
			Description: `set the acceptable quorum expected for list operations e.g. "optimal", "reduced", "disk", "strict", "auto"` + defaultHelpPostfix(apiListQuorum),
			Optional:    true,
			Type:        "string",
		},
		config.HelpKV{
			Key:         apiReplicationPriority,

 *   <li>equalsImpl: which implementation of array equality to use
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p><b>Important note:</b> the primary goal of this benchmark is to ensure that varying {@code
 * whereToDiffer} produces no observable change in performance. We want to make sure that the array
 * equals implementation is *not* short-circuiting to prevent timing-based attacks. Being fast is
 * only a secondary goal.
 *