ECL0013=argument[{0}] is null or empty map.
ECL0014=argument[{0}] which is null the index of array is negative integer.
ECL0015=argument[{0}] which is null the index of array exceed the size of array[{1}].
ECL0016=key[{0}] is not included in this BeanMap : {1}.
ECL0017=Exception occurred, because {0}
ECL0041={0}''s creation failure, because {1}
ECL0040=IOException occurred, because {0}
ECL0042=An illegal access was generated by {0}, because {1}

	for len(sbuf) > 0 {
		key, value, residual, err := parsePAXRecord(sbuf)
		if err != nil {
			return nil, ErrHeader
		}
		sbuf = residual

		switch key {
		case paxGNUSparseOffset, paxGNUSparseNumBytes:
			// Validate sparse header order and value.
			if (len(sparseMap)%2 == 0 && key != paxGNUSparseOffset) ||
				(len(sparseMap)%2 == 1 && key != paxGNUSparseNumBytes) ||

		c.Fatalf("Unable to list access keys: %v", err)
	}

	epochTime := time.Unix(0, 0).UTC()
	expectedAccKeys := madmin.ListAccessKeysLDAPResp{
		ServiceAccounts: []madmin.ServiceAccountInfo{
			{
				AccessKey:  "u4ccRswj62HV3Ifwima7",
				Expiration: &epochTime,
			},
		},
	}

	if !reflect.DeepEqual(expectedAccKeys, res) {

It might also help avoid confusion for new developers that see an unused parameter in your code and could think it's unnecessary.

///

/// info

In this example we use invented custom headers `X-Key` and `X-Token`.

But in real cases, when implementing security, you would get more benefits from using the integrated [Security utilities (the next chapter)](../security/index.md){.internal-link target=_blank}.

///

        return doGetConditionQuery();
    }

    // ===================================================================================
    //                                                                         Primary Key
    //                                                                         ===========
    public FileConfigCB acceptPK(String id) {
        assertObjectNotNull("id", id);
        BsFileConfigCB cb = this;

		f.walk(&n.X, context, visit)
	case *ast.UnaryExpr:
		f.walk(&n.X, ctxExpr, visit)
	case *ast.BinaryExpr:
		f.walk(&n.X, ctxExpr, visit)
		f.walk(&n.Y, ctxExpr, visit)
	case *ast.KeyValueExpr:
		f.walk(&n.Key, ctxExpr, visit)
		f.walk(&n.Value, ctxExpr, visit)

	case *ast.ArrayType:
		f.walk(&n.Len, ctxExpr, visit)
		f.walk(&n.Elt, ctxType, visit)
	case *ast.StructType:
		f.walk(n.Fields, ctxField, visit)

		<property name="cookieKey">"fessRoles"</property>
		<property name="encryptedCookieValue">true</property>
		<property name="cipher">
			<component class="org.codelibs.core.crypto.CachedCipher">
				<property name="key">"1234567890123456"</property>
			</component>
		</property>
		<property name="valueSeparator">"\\n"</property>
		<property name="roleSeparator">","</property>
		 -->
	</component>

                """
            ),
        ],
        detail: Annotated[
            Any,
            Doc(
                """
                Any data to be sent to the client in the `detail` key of the JSON
                response.
                """
            ),
        ] = None,
        headers: Annotated[
            Optional[Dict[str, str]],
            Doc(
                """

second_user_data = {
    "id": 4,
    "name": "Mary",
    "joined": "2018-11-30",
}

my_second_user: User = User(**second_user_data)
```

/// info

`**second_user_data` şu anlama geliyor:

Key-Value çiftini direkt olarak  `second_user_data` dictionarysine kaydet , yaptığın şey buna eşit olacak: `User(id=4, name="Mary", joined="2018-11-30")`

///

### Editor desteği

    if (comparator != null) {
      helper.add("comparator", comparator);
    }
    return helper.toString();
  }

  /** Returns an empty mutable map whose keys will respect this {@link ElementOrder}. */
  <K extends T, V> Map<K, V> createMap(int expectedSize) {
    switch (type) {
      case UNORDERED:
        return Maps.newHashMapWithExpectedSize(expectedSize);