> Does this mean I need an enterprise KMS setup to run MinIO (securely)?

No, MinIO does not depend on any third-party KMS provider. You have three options here:

- Run MinIO without a KMS. In this case all IAM data will be stored in plain-text.
- Run MinIO with a single secret key. MinIO supports a static cryptographic key
  that can act as minimal KMS. With this method all IAM data will be stored

    }

    private int getKeyLength() {
        // Java 17 switch expression for cipher key length determination
        return switch (this.cipherId) {
        case CIPHER_AES_128_CCM, CIPHER_AES_128_GCM -> 16; // AES-128 ciphers use 16-byte keys
        case CIPHER_AES_256_CCM, CIPHER_AES_256_GCM -> 32; // AES-256 ciphers use 32-byte keys
        default -> throw new IllegalArgumentException("Unsupported cipher: " + this.cipherId);

      @Override
      public int size() {
        return rest.length + 2;
      }

      @Override
      public @Nullable Object get(int index) {
        switch (index) {
          case 0:
            return first;
          case 1:
            return second;
          default:
            return rest[index - 2];
        }
      }
    };
  }

  // cloned from ImmutableCollection

        return CountDownLatch(0)
      }

      // If there's an existing AwaitIdleTask, use it. This is necessary when the executor is
      // shutdown but still busy as we can't enqueue in that case.
      val existingTask = activeTask
      if (existingTask is AwaitIdleTask) {
        return existingTask.latch
      }
      for (futureTask in futureTasks) {
        if (futureTask is AwaitIdleTask) {

        I'm asking this because answering questions and solving problems in GitHub is what consumes most of the time.

        I end up not being able to add new features, fix bugs, review pull requests, etc. as fast as I wish because I have to spend too much time handling questions.

  }

  // The java7 branch has different code depending on whether the entry indexes fit in a byte,
  // short, or int. The small table in testBuildKeepingLast_allowsOverwrite will test the byte
  // case. This method tests the short case.
  public void testBuildKeepingLast_shortTable() {
    Builder<Integer, String> builder = ImmutableMap.builder();
    Map<Integer, String> expected = new LinkedHashMap<>();
    for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {

    /** Prefix for regular expression patterns. */
    public static final String REGEXP = "regexp:";

    /** Prefix for case-sensitive regular expression patterns. */
    public static final String REGEXP_CASE = "regexpCase:";

    /** Prefix for case-insensitive regular expression patterns. */
    public static final String REGEXP_IGNORE_CASE = "regexpIgnoreCase:";

   * Set}:
   *
   * <pre>
   * collection.add(existingElement);
   * expectAdded(existingElement);</pre>
   *
   * <p>In this case, {@code collection} was not modified as a result of the {@code add()} call, and
   * the test will fail because the number of occurrences of {@code existingElement} is unchanged.
   *

////

//// tab | Windows PowerShell

<div class="termy">

```console
$ Get-Command python

C:\Users\user\code\awesome-project\.venv\Scripts\python
```

</div>

If it shows the `python` binary at `.venv\Scripts\python`, inside of your project (in this case `awesome-project`), then it worked. 🎉

////

labels.employeeNumber=Número de empleado
labels.user_telephoneNumber=Número de teléfono
labels.telephoneNumber=Número de teléfono
labels.user_homePhone=Teléfono (casa)
labels.homePhone=Teléfono (casa)
labels.user_homePostalAddress=Código postal (casa)
labels.homePostalAddress=Código postal (casa)
labels.user_labeledURI=labeledURI
labels.labeledURI=labeledURI
labels.user_roomNumber=Número de habitación
labels.roomNumber=Número de habitación