```JSON
{
  "detail": [
    {
      "type": "int_parsing",
      "loc": [
        "path",
        "item_id"
      ],
      "msg": "Input should be a valid integer, unable to parse string as an integer",
      "input": "foo"
    }
  ]
}
```

porque o parâmetro de path `item_id` tinha o valor `"foo"`, que não é um `int`.

```JSON
{
  "detail": [
    {
      "type": "int_parsing",
      "loc": [
        "path",
        "item_id"
      ],
      "msg": "Input should be a valid integer, unable to parse string as an integer",
      "input": "foo"
    }
  ]
}
```

这是因为路径参数 `item_id` 的值（`"foo"`）的类型不是 `int`。

		}
	}()

	sr.fillReq <- struct{}{} // initial fill

	return sr
}

// remaining returns the number of unread bytes
// if EOF for the underlying reader has not yet been found,
// maximum possible integer value will be returned
func (s *scanner) remaining() int64 {
	if atomic.LoadInt64(&s.end) == maxInt {
		return maxInt
	}
	return atomic.LoadInt64(&s.end) - s.pos
}

    /*
     * Equivalence's type argument is always non-nullable: Equivalence<Number>, never
     * Equivalence<@Nullable Number>. That can still produce wrappers of various types --
     * Wrapper<Number>, Wrapper<Integer>, Wrapper<@Nullable Integer>, etc. If we used just
     * Equivalence<? super T> below, no type could satisfy both that bound and T's own
     * bound. With this type, they have some overlap: in our example, Equivalence<Number>

        final List<String> items = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
            items.add(Integer.toString(i));
        }
        for (int i = 40; i < 370; i += 10) {
            items.add(Integer.toString(i));
        }
        items.add(Integer.toString(365));
        return items;
    }

    private boolean isRagSectionVisible() {

    if (minCapacity < 0) {
      throw new IllegalArgumentException("cannot store more than Integer.MAX_VALUE elements");
    } else if (minCapacity <= oldCapacity) {
      return oldCapacity;
    }
    // careful of overflow!
    int newCapacity = oldCapacity + (oldCapacity >> 1) + 1;
    if (newCapacity < minCapacity) {
      newCapacity = Integer.highestOneBit(minCapacity - 1) << 1;
    }
    if (newCapacity < 0) {

        throw new IllegalArgumentException("cannot store more than Integer.MAX_VALUE elements");
      } else if (minCapacity <= oldCapacity) {
        return oldCapacity;
      }
      // careful of overflow!
      int newCapacity = oldCapacity + (oldCapacity >> 1) + 1;
      if (newCapacity < minCapacity) {
        newCapacity = Integer.highestOneBit(minCapacity - 1) << 1;
      }
      if (newCapacity < 0) {

        nestedMap.put("nested_key", "nested_value");

        Map<String, Object> sourceMap = new HashMap<>();
        sourceMap.put("string", "test");
        sourceMap.put("integer", 42);
        sourceMap.put("long", 100L);
        sourceMap.put("double", 3.14);
        sourceMap.put("boolean", false);
        sourceMap.put("null_value", null);
        sourceMap.put("nested", nestedMap);

        // Assert
        assertNotNull(transPeekNamedPipe);
        assertNull(transPeekNamedPipe.name);
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @ValueSource(ints = { 0, 1, -1, Integer.MAX_VALUE, Integer.MIN_VALUE, 0xFFFF })
    @DisplayName("Constructor should handle various FID values")
    void testConstructorWithVariousFids(int fid) {
        // Act

```JSON
{
  "detail": [
    {
      "type": "int_parsing",
      "loc": [
        "path",
        "item_id"
      ],
      "msg": "Input should be a valid integer, unable to parse string as an integer",
      "input": "foo"
    }
  ]
}
```

경로 매개변수 `item_id`가 `int`가 아닌 `"foo"` 값을 가졌기 때문입니다.