}

  public void testConstraint() {
    /*
     * We'll give ourselves a pass on testing all the possible ways of breaking the constraint,
     * because we know that newClassMap() is implemented using ConstrainedMap which is itself
     * well-tested. A purist would object to this, but what can I say, we're dirty cheaters.
     */
    map.put(Integer.class, new Integer(5));

   * https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/22/docs/api/java.base/java/util/Collections.html#synchronizedCollection(java.util.Collection)
   *
   * Similarly, we avoid having those methods *implemented* in terms of *other* TestSet methods
   * that will perform holdsLock assertions:
   *
   * - For iterator(), we can accomplish that by not overriding iterator() at all. That way, we

 *     .makeMap();
 * }
 *
 * <p>These features are all optional; {@code new MapMaker().makeMap()} returns a valid concurrent
 * map that behaves similarly to a {@link ConcurrentHashMap}.
 *
 * <p>The returned map is implemented as a hash table with similar performance characteristics to
 * {@link ConcurrentHashMap}. It supports all optional operations of the {@code ConcurrentMap}
 * interface. It does not permit null keys or values.
 *

   * implemented in terms of that method (though they will likely be overridden by subclasses for
   * performance reasons).) This means that a call to this method have can different behavior in GWT
   * and non-GWT environments UNLESS subclasses are careful to always override all methods
   * implemented in terms of sortedDelegate (except comparator()).
   */

   * identically to this equivalence.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning: do not depend</b> on the behavior of this method.
   *
   * <p>Historically, {@code Equivalence} instances in this library have implemented this method to
   * recognize certain cases where distinct {@code Equivalence} instances would in fact behave
   * identically. However, as code migrates to {@code java.util.function}, that behavior will

     */
    public SmbTransport createTransport(NetworkInterfaceInfo localInterface, NetworkInterfaceInfo remoteInterface) throws IOException {
        // This would need to be implemented based on the actual SmbTransport constructor
        // For now, return null - this needs integration with the actual transport creation

/**
 * Tests our AtomicHelper fallback strategies in AbstractFuture.
 *
 * <p>On different platforms AbstractFuture uses different strategies for its core synchronization
 * primitives. The strategies are all implemented as subtypes of AtomicHelper and the strategy is
 * selected in the static initializer of AbstractFuture. This is convenient and performant but
 * introduces some testing difficulties. This test exercises the fallback strategies.
 *

import java.util.logging.Level;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A helper which does some thread-safe operations for aggregate futures, which must be implemented
 * differently in GWT. Namely:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Lazily initializes a set of seen exceptions
 *   <li>Decrements a counter atomically
 * </ul>
 */
@GwtCompatible

            // When
            PropertyConfiguration testConfig = new PropertyConfiguration(props);

            // Then
            // System properties should take precedence (if implemented)
            String domain = testConfig.getDefaultDomain();
            assertTrue(domain.equals("systemdomain") || domain.equals("propsdomain"));

        } finally {
            // Cleanup

 *     .makeMap();
 * }
 *
 * <p>These features are all optional; {@code new MapMaker().makeMap()} returns a valid concurrent
 * map that behaves similarly to a {@link ConcurrentHashMap}.
 *
 * <p>The returned map is implemented as a hash table with similar performance characteristics to
 * {@link ConcurrentHashMap}. It supports all optional operations of the {@code ConcurrentMap}
 * interface. It does not permit null keys or values.
 *