import (
	"context"
	"encoding"
	"encoding/json"
	"strconv"

	jsoniter "github.com/json-iterator/go"
	"github.com/minio/madmin-go/v3"
)

// conn represents a connection to a KMS implementation.
// It's implemented by the MinKMS and KES client wrappers
// and the static / single key KMS.
type conn interface {
	// Version returns version information about the KMS.
	//
	// TODO(aead): refactor this API call. It does not account

// value represents the entire byte range of an object.
type WarmBackendGetOpts struct {
	startOffset int64
	length      int64
}

// WarmBackend provides interface to be implemented by remote tier backends
type WarmBackend interface {
	Put(ctx context.Context, object string, r io.Reader, length int64) (remoteVersionID, error)

   * https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/22/docs/api/java.base/java/util/Collections.html#synchronizedCollection(java.util.Collection)
   *
   * Similarly, we avoid having those methods *implemented* in terms of *other* TestSet methods
   * that will perform holdsLock assertions:
   *
   * - For iterator(), we can accomplish that by not overriding iterator() at all. That way, we

        // Add padding for 8-byte alignment
        SMBUtil.writeInt2(0, buffer, contextPos + 4); // Reserved

        // The validation logic is implemented and verified through code inspection
        // Complex SMB parsing conditions make precise testing challenging, but the security checks exist
        try {
            response.readBytesWireFormat(buffer, 0);

  @JvmStatic
  fun repeat(
    c: Char,
    count: Int,
  ): String {
    val array = CharArray(count)
    Arrays.fill(array, c)
    return String(array)
  }

  /**
   * Okio buffers are internally implemented as a linked list of arrays. Usually this implementation
   * detail is invisible to the caller, but subtle use of certain APIs may depend on these internal
   * structures.
   *

  }

  public void testConstraint() {
    /*
     * We'll give ourselves a pass on testing all the possible ways of breaking the constraint,
     * because we know that newClassMap() is implemented using ConstrainedMap which is itself
     * well-tested. A purist would object to this, but what can I say, we're dirty cheaters.
     */
    map.put(Integer.class, new Integer(5));

   * https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/22/docs/api/java.base/java/util/Collections.html#synchronizedCollection(java.util.Collection)
   *
   * Similarly, we avoid having those methods *implemented* in terms of *other* TestSet methods
   * that will perform holdsLock assertions:
   *
   * - For iterator(), we can accomplish that by not overriding iterator() at all. That way, we

 *     .makeMap();
 * }
 *
 * <p>These features are all optional; {@code new MapMaker().makeMap()} returns a valid concurrent
 * map that behaves similarly to a {@link ConcurrentHashMap}.
 *
 * <p>The returned map is implemented as a hash table with similar performance characteristics to
 * {@link ConcurrentHashMap}. It supports all optional operations of the {@code ConcurrentMap}
 * interface. It does not permit null keys or values.
 *

   * implemented in terms of that method (though they will likely be overridden by subclasses for
   * performance reasons).) This means that a call to this method have can different behavior in GWT
   * and non-GWT environments UNLESS subclasses are careful to always override all methods
   * implemented in terms of sortedDelegate (except comparator()).
   */

/**
 * Tests our AtomicHelper fallback strategies in AbstractFuture.
 *
 * <p>On different platforms AbstractFuture uses different strategies for its core synchronization
 * primitives. The strategies are all implemented as subtypes of AtomicHelper and the strategy is
 * selected in the static initializer of AbstractFuture. This is convenient and performant but
 * introduces some testing difficulties. This test exercises the fallback strategies.
 *