erneut zu berechnen.">„Cache“</abbr> und übergibt diesen gecachten Wert an alle „Dependanten“, die ihn in diesem spezifischen Request benötigen, anstatt die Abhängigkeit mehrmals für denselben Request aufzurufen.

In einem fortgeschrittenen Szenario, bei dem Sie wissen, dass die Abhängigkeit bei jedem Schritt (möglicherweise mehrmals) in derselben Anfrage aufgerufen werden muss, anstatt den zwischengespeicherten Wert zu verwenden, können Sie den Parameter `use_cache=False` festlegen, wenn Sie...

        SmbRenewableCredentials impl = supplier.get();

        // Act: call renew
        CredentialsInternal renewed = impl.renew();

        // Assert: verify behavior based on scenario
        if (expectSame) {
            assertSame(impl, renewed, "renew() should return the same instance");
        } else if (expectNew) {
            assertNotNull(renewed, "renew() should return a new non-null instance");

        assertEquals(firstCall, secondCall);
        assertEquals(secondCall, thirdCall);
    }

    // Test with changing query string (though typically wouldn't change in real scenario)
    public void test_getServletPath_withChangingQueryString() {
        final String originalPath = "/original/path";
        final String customPath = "/api/v1/dynamic";
        mockRequest.setServletPath(originalPath);

OkHttpClient client = new OkHttpClient.Builder()
    .sslSocketFactory(clientCertificates.sslSocketFactory(), clientCertificates.trustManager())
    .build();
```

Client Authentication
---------------------

The above scenario is representative of most TLS set ups: the client uses certificates to validate
the identity of a server. The converse is also possible. Here we create a server that authenticates
a client and a client that authenticates a server.

  never enter the Succeeded phase may need to adapt their controllers. This is because as a consequence of 
  the change pods which use RestartPolicy=Always may end up in the Succeeded phase in two scenarios: pod 
  deletion and graceful node shutdown. ([#115331](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/115331), [@mimowo](https://github.com/mimowo)) [SIG Cloud Provider, Node and Testing]

* kubeadm: fix a possible panic when joining a new control plane node in HA scenarios ([#72123](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/72123), [@anitgandhi](https://github.com/anitgandhi))

        assertEquals("custom_field", queryContext.getDefaultField());

        queryContext.setDefaultField(null);
        assertNull(queryContext.getDefaultField());
    }

    // Test complex scenario with multiple operations
    public void test_complexScenario() {
        getMockRequest().setAttribute(Constants.FIELD_LOGS, new HashMap<String, List<String>>());

En un escenario avanzado donde sabes que necesitas que la dependencia se llame en cada paso (posiblemente varias veces) en el mismo request en lugar de usar el valor "cache", puedes establecer el parámetro `use_cache=False` al usar `Depends`:

        assertNotNull(retrieved);
        assertEquals(engine, retrieved);
    }

    // Test concurrent-like scenario (sequential but simulating concurrent behavior)
    public void test_add_multipleSameNameSequential() {
        TestScriptEngine engine1 = new TestScriptEngine("v1");
        TestScriptEngine engine2 = new TestScriptEngine("v2");

      required: false

  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        #### Ubiquity: provide concrete use cases


        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this feature in a real-world scenario, or is it
        just a feature that seems like a sensible addition to Guava?


        Before new features get added to Guava, we really want to be sure that it's for a use case