*   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link

            // Act
            MsrpcSamrConnect2 msg = new MsrpcSamrConnect2(systemName, accessMask, ph);

            // Assert - instance should be created and extend proper class
            assertNotNull(msg);
            assertTrue(msg instanceof samr.SamrConnect2);
            assertTrue(msg instanceof DcerpcMessage);
        }
    }

    @Nested

import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.Reader;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Unit tests for {@link Closeables}.
 *
 * <p>Checks proper closing behavior, and ensures that IOExceptions on Closeable.close() are not
 * propagated out from the {@link Closeables#close} method if {@code swallowException} is true.
 *
 * @author Michael Lancaster
 */
@NullUnmarked

            // Close the digest
            digest.close();

            // Verify operations fail after close
            byte[] data = new byte[128];
            // Initialize the data buffer with proper SMB2 header structure
            SMBUtil.writeInt4(0xFE534D42, data, 0); // SMB2 signature
            SMBUtil.writeInt4(0x0000, data, 12); // Command = 0
            SMBUtil.writeInt4(0x0000, data, 16); // Flags = 0

 * and the <code>jcifs.resolveOrder</code> property. Changing
 * jCIFS name resolution properties can greatly affect the behavior of
 * the client and may be necessary for proper operation.
 * <p>
 * This class should be used in favor of {@code InetAddress} to resolve
 * hostnames on LANs and WANs that support a mixture of NetBIOS/WINS and
 * DNS resolvable hosts.
 */

                 * Threads from our private pool are never interrupted. Threads from a
                 * user-supplied executor might be, but... what can we do? This is another reason
                 * to return a proper ListenableFuture instead of using listenInPoolThread.
                 */
                getUninterruptibly(delegate);
              } catch (Throwable t) {

 * @see eu.maveniverse.domtrip.maven.PomEditor
 */
public class DomUtils {

    private DomUtils() {
        // Utility class
    }

    /**
     * Inserts a new child element to the given parent element with proper Maven POM ordering.
     *
     * @param name the name of the new element
     * @param parent the parent element
     * @return the new element
     *
     */

 * Manages a pool of byte buffers to reduce garbage collection overhead.
 *
 * Performance optimizations:
 * - Uses ConcurrentLinkedQueue for O(1) operations
 * - Lock-free operations for better concurrency
 * - Proper buffer validation and limits
 */
public class BufferCache {

    /**
     * Private constructor to prevent instantiation of this utility class.
     */
    private BufferCache() {

## Documentar el callback { #documenting-the-callback }

El código real del callback dependerá mucho de tu propia aplicación API.

Y probablemente variará mucho de una aplicación a otra.

Podría ser solo una o dos líneas de código, como:

```Python
callback_url = "https://example.com/api/v1/invoices/events/"

E foi imensamente testado na fase de design, antes de qualquer implementação, para garantir que funcionaria para todos os editores de texto.

Houveram mudanças no próprio Pydantic para que isso fosse possível.

As capturas de tela anteriores foram capturas no <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com" class="external-link" target="_blank">Visual Studio Code</a>.