slf4jLogger.debug(buff.toString());
            }
        }
    }

    // Needed to make this method package visible to make writing a unit test possible
    // Maybe it's better to move some of those methods to separate class (SoC).
    void properties(CliRequest cliRequest) throws Exception {
        Properties paths = new Properties();
        if (cliRequest.topDirectory != null) {

         *
         * OK, it's technically possible for this to fail in the presence of unsafe publishing, as
         * discussed in the comments in TimeoutFuture. TODO(cpovirk): Maybe check for null before
         * calling recordOutputCancellation?
         */
        requireNonNull(localState).recordOutputCancellation(interruptIfRunning);
        return true;
      }
      return false;

// * int is used as an index into arrays.
// * Deletion functions are safe to call on nullptr.
//
// Questions left to address:
// * Might at some point need a way for callers to provide their own Env.
// * Maybe add TF_TensorShape that encapsulates dimension info.
//
// Design decisions made:
// * Backing store for tensor memory has an associated deallocation
//   function.  This deallocation function will point to client code

    assertSame(t, popLoggedThrowable());
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Can we replace makeLocalCache with a call to builder.build()? Some tests may
   * need access to LocalCache APIs, but maybe we can at least make makeLocalCache use
   * builder.build() and then cast?
   */

  private static <K, V> LocalCache<K, V> makeLocalCache(
      CacheBuilder<? super K, ? super V> builder) {

    assertSame(t, popLoggedThrowable());
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Can we replace makeLocalCache with a call to builder.build()? Some tests may
   * need access to LocalCache APIs, but maybe we can at least make makeLocalCache use
   * builder.build() and then cast?
   */

  private static <K, V> LocalCache<K, V> makeLocalCache(
      CacheBuilder<? super K, ? super V> builder) {

         *
         * OK, it's technically possible for this to fail in the presence of unsafe publishing, as
         * discussed in the comments in TimeoutFuture. TODO(cpovirk): Maybe check for null before
         * calling recordOutputCancellation?
         */
        requireNonNull(localState).recordOutputCancellation(interruptIfRunning);
        return true;
      }
      return false;

            <multiplicity>*</multiplicity>
          </association>
        </field>
      </fields>
      <comment>We could probably have a specific element for a dev mailing list for things like CI,
        and maybe even a specific element for the user and scm mailing lists. Then leave the more
        lose structure for any other type of mailing list.</comment>
      <codeSegments>
        <codeSegment>

came skimming out, straight at the Footman's head:  it just
grazed his nose, and broke to pieces against one of the trees
behind him.

  `--or next day, maybe,' the Footman continued in the same tone,
exactly as if nothing had happened.

  `How am I to get in?' asked Alice again, in a louder tone.

  `ARE you to get in at all?' said the Footman.  `That's the

       * prototype checker's JDK. However, the checker still sees the return type as plain
       * `Enumeration<?>`, probably because of one of the following two bugs (and maybe those two
       * bugs are themselves just symptoms of the same underlying problem):
       *
       * https://github.com/typetools/checker-framework/issues/3030
       *

       * prototype checker's JDK. However, the checker still sees the return type as plain
       * `Enumeration<?>`, probably because of one of the following two bugs (and maybe those two
       * bugs are themselves just symptoms of the same underlying problem):
       *
       * https://github.com/typetools/checker-framework/issues/3030
       *