}

  @CollectionSize.Require(SEVERAL)
  public void testHigherHole() {
    resetWithHole();
    assertEquals(c, navigableSet.higher(a));
    assertEquals(c, navigableSet.higher(b));
    assertEquals(null, navigableSet.higher(c));
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): make "too small" and "too large" elements available for better navigation

        return address != null && !address.isLoopbackAddress() 
            && !address.isLinkLocalAddress();
    }
    
    public int getScore() {
        // Score interface for selection (higher is better)
        int score = linkSpeed;  // Base score is link speed
        
        if (rssCapable) score += 1000;   // Prefer RSS-capable
        if (rdmaCapable) score += 2000;  // Prefer RDMA-capable

    }

    @Override
    public SortedSet<E> headSet(E toElement) {
      return headSet(toElement, false);
    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable E higher(E e) {
      synchronized (mutex) {
        return delegate().higher(e);
      }
    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable E lower(E e) {
      synchronized (mutex) {
        return delegate().lower(e);
      }
    }

   *
   * <p>Ideally, this number should be close to the {@code fpp} parameter passed in {@linkplain
   * #create(Funnel, int, double)}, or smaller. If it is significantly higher, it is usually the
   * case that too many elements (more than expected) have been put in the {@code BloomFilter},
   * degenerating it.
   *
   * @since 14.0 (since 11.0 as expectedFalsePositiveProbability())
   */

   * AbstractFutureState's private fields. However, our open-source build uses `-source 8 -target
   * 8`, so the class files from that build can't express nestmates. Thus, when those class files
   * are used from Java 9 or higher (i.e., high enough to trigger the VarHandle code path), such a
   * lookup would fail with an IllegalAccessException. That may then trigger use of Unsafe (possibly
   * with a warning under recent JVMs), or it may fall back even further to

    protected boolean useExtendedSecurity = true;
    /** Force use of extended security negotiation */
    protected boolean forceExtendedSecurity = false;
    /** Whether to negotiate only SMB2 or higher protocols */
    protected boolean smb2OnlyNegotiation = false;
    /** Whether to failover to port 139 if port 445 fails */
    protected boolean port139FailoverEnabled = false;
    /** Whether to use NT SMB operations */

   * services will either be {@linkplain Service.State#TERMINATED terminated} or {@linkplain
   * Service.State#FAILED failed}.
   */
  public void awaitStopped() {
    state.awaitStopped();
  }

  /**
   * Waits for the all the services to reach a terminal state for no more than the given time. After
   * this method returns all services will either be {@linkplain Service.State#TERMINATED

    // but centerFloor + 1 is, we'll definitely find that. The closest value to the true (unrounded)
    // center will be at either low or high.
    int low = requiredFrom;
    int high = requiredTo;
    while (high > low + 1) {
      int mid = (low + high) >>> 1;
      if (allRequired[mid] > centerFloor) {
        high = mid;
      } else if (allRequired[mid] < centerFloor) {
        low = mid;
      } else {

   * rate, and ability to be implemented with O(1) time complexity. The initial LRU implementation
   * operates per-segment rather than globally for increased implementation simplicity. We expect
   * the cache hit rate to be similar to that of a global LRU algorithm.
   */

  // Constants

  /**
   * The maximum capacity, used if a higher value is implicitly specified by either of the

 *       deadlock situation, and the appropriate Policy is executed.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Note that detection of potential deadlock does not necessarily indicate that deadlock will
 * happen, as it is possible that higher level application logic prevents the cyclic lock
 * acquisition from occurring. One example of a false positive is:
 *
 * <pre>
 * LockA -&gt; LockB -&gt; LockC
 * LockA -&gt; LockC -&gt; LockB
 * </pre>
 *