}, 1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);

    System.out.printf("%.2f Executing call.%n", (System.nanoTime() - startNanos) / 1e9f);
    try (Response response = call.execute()) {
      System.out.printf("%.2f Call was expected to fail, but completed: %s%n",
          (System.nanoTime() - startNanos) / 1e9f, response);
    } catch (IOException e) {
      System.out.printf("%.2f Call failed as expected: %s%n",
          (System.nanoTime() - startNanos) / 1e9f, e);

  <version>9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava</version>
  <name>Guava ListenableFuture only</name>
  <description>
    An empty artifact that Guava depends on to signal that it is providing
    ListenableFuture -- but is also available in a second "version" that
    contains com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture class, without
    any other Guava classes. The idea is:

    checkPublicSuffix("example.example", "example.example")
    checkPublicSuffix("b.example.example", "example.example")
    checkPublicSuffix("a.b.example.example", "example.example")
    // Listed, but non-Internet, TLD.
    // checkPublicSuffix("local", null);
    // checkPublicSuffix("example.local", null);
    // checkPublicSuffix("b.example.local", null);
    // checkPublicSuffix("a.b.example.local", null);

    expectReturnsTrue(disjoint);
    expectContents();
  }

  // retainAll(null)

  /*
   * AbstractCollection fails the retainAll(null) test when the subject
   * collection is empty, but we'd still like to test retainAll(null) when we
   * can. We split the test into empty and non-empty cases. This allows us to
   * suppress only the former.
   */

  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)

  }
}
```

This is implemented using `suspendCancellableCoroutine`
but uses the standard Dispatcher in OkHttp. This means
that by default Kotlin's Dispatchers are not used.

Cancellation if implemented sensibly in both directions.
Cancelling a coroutine scope, will cancel the call.
Cancelling a call, will throw a CancellationException

 * Futures#transform(ListenableFuture, com.google.common.base.Function, Executor) Futures.transform}
 * (or {@link FluentFuture#transform(com.google.common.base.Function, Executor)
 * FluentFuture.transform}), but you will often find it easier to use a framework. Frameworks
 * automate the process, often adding features like monitoring, debugging, and cancellation.
 * Examples of frameworks include:
 *
 * <ul>

 * Futures#transform(ListenableFuture, com.google.common.base.Function, Executor) Futures.transform}
 * (or {@link FluentFuture#transform(com.google.common.base.Function, Executor)
 * FluentFuture.transform}), but you will often find it easier to use a framework. Frameworks
 * automate the process, often adding features like monitoring, debugging, and cancellation.
 * Examples of frameworks include:
 *
 * <ul>

 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code
 *       ImmutableList.get} returns {@code E}, but that value is never {@code null}. (Accordingly,
 *       {@code ImmutableList} is declared to forbid {@code ImmutableList<@Nullable String>}.)
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can return {@code null} regardless

 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code
 *       ImmutableList.get} returns {@code E}, but that value is never {@code null}. (Accordingly,
 *       {@code ImmutableList} is declared to forbid {@code ImmutableList<@Nullable String>}.)
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can return {@code null} regardless

 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code
 *       ImmutableList.get} returns {@code E}, but that value is never {@code null}. (Accordingly,
 *       {@code ImmutableList} is declared to forbid {@code ImmutableList<@Nullable String>}.)
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can return {@code null} regardless