*
       * - rowEntry isn't cleared except below. If it was cleared below, then either
       *   columnIterator.remove() would have failed above (if the user hasn't called next() since
       *   then) or rowEntry would have been initialized by next() (as discussed above).
       */
      if (requireNonNull(rowEntry).getValue().isEmpty()) {
        rowIterator.remove();
        rowEntry = null;
      }
    }
  }

## Example { #example }

Here's an example *path operation* with parameters using some of the above types.

{* ../../docs_src/extra_data_types/tutorial001_an_py310.py hl[1,3,12:16] *}

Note that the parameters inside the function have their natural data type, and you can, for example, perform normal date manipulations, like:

]
```

These are **JavaScript** objects, not strings, so you can't pass them from Python code directly.

### Step 2: Enable Redis bucket notification using MinIO client

	latest := ""

	// Find the common cardinality from previously collected
	// occurrences of elements.
	for etag, count := range etagOccurrenceMap {
		if count < maxima {
			continue
		}

		// We are at or above maxima
		if count > maxima {
			maxima = count
			latest = etag
		}
	}

	// Return the collected common max time, with maxima
	return latest, maxima
}

   * to calling it exactly once.
   *
   * @since 10.0 (present in 1.0 as {@code run})
   */
  public void execute() {
    // Lock while we update our state so the add method above will finish adding any listeners
    // before we start to run them.
    RunnableExecutorPair list;
    synchronized (this) {
      if (executed) {
        return;
      }
      executed = true;

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code