String badUnicode = "\uDC00\uD800";
    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> escaper.escape(badUnicode));
  }

  public void testSafeRange() throws IOException {
    // Basic escaping of unsafe chars (wrap them in {,}'s)
    UnicodeEscaper wrappingEscaper =
        new ArrayBasedUnicodeEscaper(NO_REPLACEMENTS, 'A', 'Z', null) {
          @Override
          protected char[] escapeUnsafe(int c) {

        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @DisplayName("getBytes should handle various string inputs")
        @NullAndEmptySource
        @ValueSource(strings = { "Simple ASCII", "Special chars: !@#$%^&*()", "Unicode: ñöt ascii ℃", "Mixed: ASCII + 中文 + Русский",
                "Emojis: 🎉🌟💻", "Very long string with multiple words and various characters 1234567890" })
        void testGetBytesWithVariousInputs(String input) {

    }

    @Test
    public void test_constructor_withSpecialCharactersInMessage() {
        // Test constructor with special characters in message
        final String message = "Job failed with special chars: \n\t\r\"'<>&";
        final JobProcessingException exception = new JobProcessingException(message);

        assertNotNull(exception);
        assertEquals(message, exception.getMessage());
    }

    @Test

    assertTrue(Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase(new String(IGNORED), new String(IGNORED)));
    // Compare to: "\u00c1".equalsIgnoreCase("\u00e1") == true
    assertFalse(Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase("\u00c1", "\u00e1"));
    // Test chars just outside the alphabetic range ('A'-1 vs 'a'-1, 'Z'+1 vs 'z'+1)
    assertFalse(Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase("@", "`"));
    assertFalse(Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase("[", "{"));
  }

    assertTrue(Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase(new String(IGNORED), new String(IGNORED)));
    // Compare to: "\u00c1".equalsIgnoreCase("\u00e1") == true
    assertFalse(Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase("\u00c1", "\u00e1"));
    // Test chars just outside the alphabetic range ('A'-1 vs 'a'-1, 'Z'+1 vs 'z'+1)
    assertFalse(Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase("@", "`"));
    assertFalse(Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase("[", "{"));
  }

}

func handleSQLTrim(r Record, e *TrimFunc, tableAlias string) (res *Value, err error) {
	chars := ""
	ok := false
	if e.TrimChars != nil {
		charsV, cerr := e.TrimChars.evalNode(r, tableAlias)
		if cerr != nil {
			return nil, cerr
		}
		inferTypeAsString(charsV)
		chars, ok = charsV.ToString()
		if !ok {
			return nil, errNonStringTrimArg
		}
	}

piece of functionality that enters different code paths depending on whether
the index has 1 shards or 2+ shards, then we shouldn't just test against an
index with a random number of shards: there should be one test for the 1-shard
case, and another test for the 2+ shards case.

==== Abuse randomization in multi-threaded tests

Multi-threaded tests are often not reproducible due to the fact that there is

Before starting migration, assess your current system:

- **Document Count**: Total number of indexed documents
- **Index Size**: Storage requirements for search indices
- **Crawl Sources**: URLs, file shares, databases being indexed
- **Custom Configurations**: URL patterns, security rules, metadata fields
- **Search Features**: Facets, suggestions, security filtering, ranking rules

            public void onResponse(final SearchResponse searchResponse) {
                if (searchResponse.getFailedShards() > 0) {
                    deferred.reject(new SuggesterException("Search failure. Failed shards num:" + searchResponse.getFailedShards()));
                } else {
                    deferred.resolve(createResponse(searchResponse));
                }
            }

            @Override

    client.send(message4)
    serverListener.assertTextMessage(message4)

    // Server to client message that shares context with message1.
    val message5 = message1 + message1
    server.send(message5)
    clientListener.assertTextMessage(message5)

    // Client to server message that shares context with message2.
    val message6 = message2 + message2
    client.send(message6)