Isso é especialmente útil para uma **base de código grande** onde **as mesmas dependências** são utilizadas repetidamente em **muitas *operações de rota***.

## `Async` ou não, eis a questão

	golang.org/x/text v0.19.0 // indirect
	golang.org/x/tools v0.24.0 // indirect
	gopkg.in/evanphx/json-patch.v4 v4.12.0 // indirect
	gopkg.in/inf.v0 v0.9.1 // indirect
	gopkg.in/ini.v1 v1.67.0 // indirect
	k8s.io/component-base v0.31.2 // indirect
	k8s.io/kube-openapi v0.0.0-20240423202451-8948a665c108 // indirect
	sigs.k8s.io/apiserver-network-proxy/konnectivity-client v0.30.3 // indirect
	sigs.k8s.io/json v0.0.0-20221116044647-bc3834ca7abd // indirect

func (mt MetricType) String() string {
	switch mt {
	case CounterMT:
		return "counter"
	case GaugeMT:
		return "gauge"
	case HistogramMT:
		return "histogram"
	default:
		return "*unknown*"
	}
}

func (mt MetricType) toProm() prometheus.ValueType {
	switch mt {
	case CounterMT:
		return prometheus.CounterValue
	case GaugeMT:
		return prometheus.GaugeValue
	case HistogramMT:
		return prometheus.CounterValue

/**
 * This class now contains only utilities for config parsing.
 * 
 * We strongly suggest that you create an explicit {@link jcifs.context.CIFSContextWrapper}
 * with your desired config. It's base implementation {@link jcifs.context.BaseContext}
 * should be sufficient for most needs.
 * 
 * If you want to retain the classic singleton behavior you can use
 * {@link jcifs.context.SingletonContext#getInstance()}

import jcifs.smb.SmbAuthException;


/**
 * This servlet may be used with pre-2.3 servlet containers
 * to protect content with NTLM HTTP Authentication. Servlets that
 * extend this abstract base class may be authenticated against an SMB
 * server or domain controller depending on how the
 * <tt>jcifs.smb.client.domain</tt> or <tt>jcifs.http.domainController</tt>
 * properties are be specified. <b>With later containers the

import org.apache.commons.text.StringEscapeUtils;
import org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager;
import org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger;
import org.codelibs.core.lang.StringUtil;
import org.codelibs.fess.app.web.base.login.FessCredential;
import org.codelibs.fess.mylasta.action.FessUserBean;
import org.codelibs.fess.util.ComponentUtil;
import org.dbflute.optional.OptionalThing;
import org.lastaflute.web.login.credential.LoginCredential;

 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */

package com.google.common.collect;

import static com.google.common.base.MoreObjects.toStringHelper;
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertWithMessage;
import static java.lang.Integer.signum;

/// info

A "bearer" token is not the only option.

But it's the best one for our use case.

And it might be the best for most use cases, unless you are an OAuth2 expert and know exactly why there's another option that better suits your needs.

In that case, **FastAPI** also provides you with the tools to build it.

///

from typing import Optional

from fastapi.exceptions import HTTPException
from fastapi.openapi.models import HTTPBase as HTTPBaseModel
from fastapi.openapi.models import HTTPBearer as HTTPBearerModel
from fastapi.security.base import SecurityBase
from fastapi.security.utils import get_authorization_scheme_param
from pydantic import BaseModel
from starlette.requests import Request
from starlette.status import HTTP_401_UNAUTHORIZED, HTTP_403_FORBIDDEN

import static com.google.common.base.Verify.verify;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.Internal.toNanosSaturated;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import com.google.common.base.Preconditions;