* Add note to docs: [Include the same router multiple times with different `prefix`](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/tutorial/bigger-applications/#include-the-same-router-multiple-times-with-different-prefix). PR [#348](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/348).

* Fix OpenAPI/JSON Schema generation for two functions with the same name (in different modules) with the same composite bodies.

    E[] array = (E[]) elements.toArray();
    /*
     * For a Set, we guess that it contains no duplicates. That's just a guess for purpose of
     * sizing; if the Set uses different equality semantics, it might contain duplicates according
     * to equals(), and we will deduplicate those properly, albeit at some cost in allocations.
     */
    int expectedSize =

#     define_values = {"PORTABLE_PROTO_TRANSITION_MODE": "third_party"},
#     visibility = ["//visibility:public"],
# )
# copybara:uncomment_end

# 'enable_registration_v2' opts-in to a different implementation of op and
# kernel registration - REGISTER_OP, REGISTER_KERNEL_BUILDER, etc.
#
# This setting is currently experimental. The 'v2' implementation does _not_

  TF_CHECK_OK(MessageToBuffer(node_in, buffer));
  TF_CHECK_OK(BufferToMessage(buffer, &node_out));
  TF_DeleteBuffer(buffer);

  protobuf::util::MessageDifferencer differencer;
  EXPECT_TRUE(differencer.Compare(node_in, node_out));
}

TEST(CAPI, TestTensorNonScalarBytesAllocateDelete) {
  const int batch_size = 4;
  const int num_dims = 2;
  int64_t* dims = new int64_t[num_dims];

   * 0x1213141516171819L} would yield the byte array {@code {0x12, 0x13, 0x14, 0x15, 0x16, 0x17,
   * 0x18, 0x19}}.
   *
   * <p>If you need to convert and concatenate several values (possibly even of different types),
   * use a shared {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer} instance, or use {@link
   * com.google.common.io.ByteStreams#newDataOutput()} to get a growable buffer.
   */
  public static byte[] toByteArray(long value) {

- Kubelet: the HostPort implementation in dockershim was not taking into consideration the HostIP field, causing that the same HostPort can not be used with different IP addresses.
  This bug causes the conformance test "HostPort validates that there is no conflict between pods with same hostPort but different hostIP and protocol" to fail. ([#98838](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/98838), [@aojea](https://github.com/aojea)) [SIG Network and Node]

      assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().contains("index 0");
      assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().contains("[null]");
      foundProblem = true;
    }
    assertTrue("Should report error when different exception is thrown", foundProblem);
  }

  public void testMessageNoException() throws Exception {
    Method method = OneArg.class.getMethod("staticOneArgShouldThrowNpeButDoesnt", String.class);

    a = Arrays.<@Nullable Integer>asList(4, 8, 15, null, 23, 42);
    b = asList(4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42);
    assertFalse(elementsEqual(a, b));
    assertFalse(elementsEqual(b, a));

    // Different lengths.
    a = asList(4, 8, 15, 16, 23);
    b = asList(4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42);
    assertFalse(elementsEqual(a, b));
    assertFalse(elementsEqual(b, a));
  }

  public void testToString() {

      .assertCode(200)
      .assertBody("A")
    val request1ReceivedAt = System.currentTimeMillis()
    assertThat(server.takeRequest().headers["If-None-Match"]).isNull()

    // Hit that stored response. It's different, but Vary says it doesn't matter.
    Thread.sleep(10) // Make sure the timestamps are unique.
    val cacheHit =
      executeSynchronously(
        "/",
        "Accept-Language",
        "en-US",

 *
 * <pre>
 * LockA -&gt; LockB -&gt; LockC
 * LockA -&gt; LockC -&gt; LockB
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p><strong>ReadWriteLocks</strong>
 *
 * <p>While {@code ReadWriteLock} instances have different properties and can form cycles without
 * potential deadlock, this class treats {@code ReadWriteLock} instances as equivalent to
 * traditional exclusive locks. Although this increases the false positives that the locks detect