*
   * <ul>
   *   <li>We could change the serialization of this class incompatibly. We have reserved the right
   *       to make such changes to our serialized forms, and we have made them before, usually
   *       without trouble. In this case, my guess is that our chosen approach is even less likely
   *       to lead to trouble than an incompatible change would be.

It has a `GET` operation that could return an error.

It has a `POST` operation that could return several errors.

Both *path operations* require an `X-Token` header.

{* ../../docs_src/app_testing/app_b_an_py310/main.py *}

### Extended testing file { #extended-testing-file }

You could then update `test_main.py` with the extended tests:

    public void test_constantsExist() {
        // Verify all expected configuration constants are defined
        SpnegoAuthenticator authenticator = new SpnegoAuthenticator();

        // These constants should be accessible (would fail at compile time if not)
        assertTrue(SpnegoAuthenticator.class.getName().contains("SpnegoAuthenticator"));

        // Verify authenticator is properly named (no typo)

          // it is kind of lame that we need to construct a decoder to access this value.
          // if this is a concern we could add special cases for some known charsets (like utf8)
          // or we could avoid inputstreamreader and use the decoder api directly
          // TODO(lukes): in a real implementation we would need to handle overflow conditions
          int maxChars = (int) (size.get().intValue() * cs.newDecoder().maxCharsPerByte());

          // it is kind of lame that we need to construct a decoder to access this value.
          // if this is a concern we could add special cases for some known charsets (like utf8)
          // or we could avoid inputstreamreader and use the decoder api directly
          // TODO(lukes): in a real implementation we would need to handle overflow conditions
          int maxChars = (int) (size.get().intValue() * cs.newDecoder().maxCharsPerByte());

    assertThat(expected)
        .hasMessageThat()
        .isEqualTo("I bet you didn't think Thread.interrupt could throw");
    /*
     * We need to wait for the runner to exit. It used to be that the runner would get stuck in the
     * busy loop when interrupt threw.
     *
     * While we're at it, we confirm that the interrupt happened as expected.
     */

    assertThat(expected)
        .hasMessageThat()
        .isEqualTo("I bet you didn't think Thread.interrupt could throw");
    /*
     * We need to wait for the runner to exit. It used to be that the runner would get stuck in the
     * busy loop when interrupt threw.
     *
     * While we're at it, we confirm that the interrupt happened as expected.
     */

JSON can only contain UTF-8 encoded strings, so it can't contain raw bytes.

Base64 can encode binary data in strings, but to do it, it needs to use more characters than the original binary data, so it would normally be less efficient than regular files.

Use base64 only if you definitely need to include binary data in JSON, and you can't use files for that.

## Pydantic `bytes` { #pydantic-bytes }

     */
    public DisniRdmaProvider() {
        // Default constructor
    }

    private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(DisniRdmaProvider.class);

    // DiSNI components - these would be actual DiSNI objects in a real implementation
    private Object endpointGroup; // RdmaActiveEndpointGroup<DisniRdmaEndpoint>
    private Object endpoint; // RdmaActiveEndpoint
    private boolean initialized = false;

 * the very old Android Ice Cream Sandwich release), then this stream throws an exception instead of
 * creating a file that would be more accessible. (This behavior is new in Guava 32.0.0. Previous
 * versions would create a file that is more accessible, as discussed in <a
 * href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2023-2976">CVE-2023-2976</a>.
 *